Back to Search Start Over

Prospective evaluation of in vivo and phantom repeatability and reproducibility of diffusion-weighted MRI sequences on 1.5 T MRI-linear accelerator (MR-Linac) and MR simulator devices for head and neck cancers.

Authors :
McDonald BA
Salzillo T
Mulder S
Ahmed S
Dresner A
Preston K
He R
Christodouleas J
Mohamed ASR
Philippens M
van Houdt P
Thorwarth D
Wang J
Shukla Dave A
Boss M
Fuller CD
Source :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2023 Aug; Vol. 185, pp. 109717. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 19.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on MRI-linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems can potentially be used for monitoring treatment response and adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancers (HNC) but requires extensive validation. We performed technical validation to compare six total DWI sequences on an MR-linac and MR simulator (MR sim) in patients, volunteers, and phantoms.<br />Methods: Ten human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients and ten healthy volunteers underwent DWI on a 1.5 T MR-linac with three DWI sequences: echo planar imaging (EPI), split acquisition of fast spin echo signals (SPLICE), and turbo spin echo (TSE). Volunteers were also imaged on a 1.5 T MR sim with three sequences: EPI, BLADE (vendor tradename), and readout segmentation of long variable echo trains (RESOLVE). Participants underwent two scan sessions per device and two repeats of each sequence per session. Repeatability and reproducibility within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) of mean ADC were calculated for tumors and lymph nodes (patients) and parotid glands (volunteers). ADC bias, repeatability/reproducibility metrics, SNR, and geometric distortion were quantified using a phantom.<br />Results: In vivo repeatability/reproducibility wCV for parotids were 5.41%/6.72%, 3.83%/8.80%, 5.66%/10.03%, 3.44%/5.70%, 5.04%/5.66%, 4.23%/7.36% for EPI <subscript>MR-linac</subscript> , SPLICE, TSE, EPI <subscript>MR sim</subscript> , BLADE, RESOLVE. Repeatability/reproducibility wCV for EPI <subscript>MR-linac</subscript> , SPLICE, TSE were 9.64%/10.28%, 7.84%/8.96%, 7.60%/11.68% for tumors and 7.80%/9.95%, 7.23%/8.48%, 10.82%/10.44% for nodes. All sequences except TSE had phantom ADC biases within ± 0.1x10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s for most vials (EPI <subscript>MR-linac</subscript> , SPLICE, and BLADE had 2, 3, and 1 vials out of 13 with larger biases, respectively). SNR of b = 0 images was 87.3, 180.5, 161.3, 171.0, 171.9, 130.2 for EPI <subscript>MR-linac</subscript> , SPLICE, TSE, EPI <subscript>MR sim</subscript> , BLADE, RESOLVE.<br />Conclusion: MR-linac DWI sequences demonstrated near-comparable performance to MR sim sequences and warrant further clinical validation for treatment response assessment in HNC.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0887
Volume :
185
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37211282
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109717