Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy imaging for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Ahluwalia N
Roshankar G
Draycott L
Jimenez-Zepeda V
Fine N
Chan D
Han D
Miller RJH
Source :
Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology [J Nucl Cardiol] 2023 Dec; Vol. 30 (6), pp. 2464-2476. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 24.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Bone scintigraphy imaging is frequently used to investigate patients with suspected transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). However, the reported accuracy for interpretation approaches has changed over time. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of visual planar grading, heart-to-contralateral (HCL) ratio, and quantitative analysis of SPECT imaging and evaluate reasons for shifts in reported accuracy.<br />Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify studies of the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy for ATTR-CM from 1990 until February 2023 using PUBMED and EMBASE. Studies were reviewed separately by two authors for inclusion and for risk of bias assessment. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves and operating points were determined with hierarchical modeling.<br />Results: Out of a total of 428 identified studies, 119 were reviewed in detail and 23 were included in the final analysis. The studies included a total of 3954 patients, with ATTR-CM diagnosed in 1337 (39.6%) patients and prevalence ranging from 21 to 73%. Visual planar grading and quantitative analysis had higher diagnostic accuracy (.99) than HCL ratio (.96). Quantitative analysis of SPECT imaging had the highest specificity (97%) followed by planar visual grade (96%) and HCL ratio (93%). ATTR-CM prevalence accounted for some of the observed between study heterogeneity.<br />Conclusions: Bone scintigraphy imaging is highly accurate for identifying patients with ATTR-CM, with between study heterogeneity in part explained by differences in disease prevalence. We identified small differences in specificity, which may have important clinical implications when applied to low-risk screening populations.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-6551
Volume :
30
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37226006
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-023-03297-1