Back to Search Start Over

Histopathology reporting of temporal artery biopsy specimens for giant cell arteritis: results of a modified Delphi study.

Authors :
Taze D
Chakrabarty A
Venkateswaran R
Hartley C
Harden C
Morgan AW
Mackie SL
Griffin KJ
Source :
Journal of clinical pathology [J Clin Pathol] 2024 Jun 19; Vol. 77 (7), pp. 464-470. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 19.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is regarded as the gold-standard test in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). There is a lack of agreement among experienced pathologists regarding the diagnostic features and classification of inflammation observed in TAB sections in the diagnosis of GCA.<br />Aims: The aim of this research study was to establish consensus on the key parameters which should be included in a standardised reporting proforma for TAB specimens. We specifically investigated factors pertaining to clinical information, specimen handling and microscopic pathological features.<br />Methods: A modified Delphi process, comprising three survey rounds and three virtual consensus group meetings, was undertaken by 13 UK-based pathology or ophthalmology consultants, with a 100% response rate across the three rounds. Initial statements were formulated after a literature review and participants were asked to rate their agreement using a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined a priori as an agreement of ≥70% and individual feedback was provided after each round, together with data on the distribution of group responses.<br />Results: Overall, 67 statements reached consensus and 17 statements did not. The participants agreed on the core microscopic features to be included in a pathology report and felt that a proforma would facilitate consistent reporting practices.<br />Conclusions: Our work revealed uncertainty surrounding the correlation between clinical parameters (eg, laboratory markers of inflammation and steroid therapy duration) and microscopic findings, and we propose areas for future research.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: SLM reports consultancy on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, AbbVie and AstraZeneca; speaker fees received by her institution from Pfizer, Chugai and Vifor; and support from Roche to attend EULAR2019 and Pfizer to attend ACR2021.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-4146
Volume :
77
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37321853
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2023-208810