A Comprehensive Program to Improve Treatment of Precancerous Cervical Lesions in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas.

Objective: To assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention in women with cervical dysplasia who were treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), as well as the time between colposcopy and treatment.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Intervention: Clinic participation in a multicomponent cervical cancer prevention program that included community outreach, patient in-reach, and navigation, as well as provider capacity building with in-person training and ongoing telementoring through Project ECHO.
Main Outcome Measures: Medical records were reviewed to evaluate women with cervical dysplasia undergoing treatment with LEEP within 90 days of colposcopy, as well as time between colposcopy and treatment. Baseline data from year 1 were compared with each subsequent year of implementation. Additional variables examined included patient's age, history of abnormal screening results, and percentage of families living below poverty line based on county of residence, parity, and clinic site. We performed logistic regression and multiple linear regression analyses to assess the programmatic impact in the outcomes of interest by year of program implementation.
Results: A total of 290 women were included in the study. The proportion of women undergoing treatment within 90 days of colposcopy increased from 76.2% at baseline to 91.3% in year 3 and 92.9% in year 4 of program implementation. The odds of undergoing treatment within 90 days were 5.11 times higher in year 4 of program implementation than at baseline. The mean time between colposcopy and LEEP decreased from 62 days at baseline to 45 days by year 4 of program implementation.
Conclusions: Implementation of our multicomponent cervical cancer prevention program increased the proportion of women undergoing LEEP within 90 days of colposcopy and decreased the time between colposcopy and LEEP. This program has the potential to support cervical cancer prevention efforts and could be implemented in other low-resource settings.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)