Back to Search Start Over

The safety and efficacy of balloon-expandable versus self-expanding trans-catheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors :
Senguttuvan NB
Bhatt H
Balakrishnan VK
Krishnamoorthy P
Goel S
Reddy PMK
Subramanian V
Claessen BE
Kumar A
Majmundar M
Ro R
Lerakis S
Jayaraj R
Kalra A
Flather M
Dangas G
Tang GHL
Source :
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine [Front Cardiovasc Med] 2023 May 25; Vol. 10, pp. 1130354. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 25 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Aim: Transfemoral Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TF-TAVR) is a safe and effective therapy compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients across all risk profiles using balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV). Our aim was to compare safety and efficacy of BEV vs. SEV in high-risk patients undergoing TF-TAVR.<br />Methods and Results: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus, and Web of sciences for studies on patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria were also examined. Six studies with 2,935 patients (1,439 to BEV and 1,496 to SEV) were included. BEV was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (2.2% vs. 4.5%; RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.82; p  < 0.006) and cardiovascular mortality [(2.5% vs. 4.3%; RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90; p  = 0.01) at 30 days compared with SEV. Implantation of more than one valve per procedure (0.78% vs. 5.11%; RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.07-0.31; p  < 0.00001), and moderate/severe AR/PVL (2.5% vs. 9.01%; RR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.17-0.48); p  < 0.00001) were also lower in the BEV arm.<br />Conclusion: BEV TAVR is associated with reduced all-cause mortality (High level of GRADE evidence), cardiovascular mortality (very low level) at 30 days compared with SEV TAVR in high surgical risk patients. Data are necessary to determine if the difference in outcomes persists in longer-term and if the same effects are seen in lower-risk patients.<br />Systematic Review Registration: identifier, CRD42020181190.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (© 2023 Senguttuvan, Bhatt, Balakrishnan, Krishnamoorthy, Goel, Reddy, Subramanian, Claessen, Kumar, Majmundar, Ro, Lerakis, Jayaraj, Kalra, Flather, Dangas and Tang.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2297-055X
Volume :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37351289
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1130354