Back to Search Start Over

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord stimulator implantation.

Authors :
Goel V
Kaizer AM
Jain S
Darrow D
Shankar H
Source :
Regional anesthesia and pain medicine [Reg Anesth Pain Med] 2024 Mar 04; Vol. 49 (3), pp. 192-199. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 04.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most dreaded complications after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation surgery. As a result, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been proposed to avoid accidental damage to nervous structures under anesthesia and confirm positioning for optimal stimulation. Our study uses a large administrative claims database to determine the 30-day risk of SCI after SCS implantation.<br />Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients undergoing SCS surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up, IONM use, the type of sedation used during the procedure, and subsequent SCI were identified using administrative codes. In addition, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between various risk factors and subsequent SCI.<br />Results: A total of 9676 patients underwent SCS surgery (64.7% percutaneous implants) during the study period. Nine hundred and forty-four (9.75%) patients underwent SCS implantation with IONM. Conscious sedation, Monitored Anesthesia Care anesthesia, and general anesthesia were used in patients with 0.9%, 60.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Eighty-one (0.8%) patients developed SCI within 30 days after SCS implant surgery. The SCI rate was higher in the group that underwent IONM (2% vs 0.7%, p value <0.001) during the implantation procedure, reflecting the underlying risk. After adjustment for other factors, the OR of SCI is 2.39 (95% CI: 1.33 to 4.14, p value=0.002) times higher for those with IONM than those without IONM.<br />Conclusions: Increased SCI risk among patients with IONM likely reflects higher baseline risk, and further research is needed for risk mitigation.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8651
Volume :
49
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37407277
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104325