Progressive development of synchronous activity in the hippocampal neuronal network is modulated by GluK1 kainate receptors.

Kainate receptors are potent modulators of circuit excitability and have been repeatedly implicated in pathophysiological synchronization of limbic networks. While the role of aberrant GluK2 subunit containing KARs in generation of epileptiform hypersynchronous activity is well described, the contribution of other KAR subtypes, including GluK1 subunit containing KARs remain less well understood. To investigate the contribution of GluK1 KARs in developmental and pathological synchronization of the hippocampal neural network, we used multielectrode array recordings on organotypic hippocampal slices that display first multi-unit activity and later spontaneous population discharges resembling ictal-like epileptiform activity (IEA). Chronic blockage of GluK1 activity using selective antagonist ACET or lentivirally delivered shRNA significantly delayed developmental synchronization of the hippocampal CA3 network and generation of IEA. GluK1 overexpression, on the other hand, had no significant effect on occurrence of IEA, but enhanced the size of the neuron population participating in the population discharges. Correlation analysis indicated that local knockdown of GluK1 locally in the CA3 neurons reduced their functional connectivity, while GluK1 overexpression increased the connectivity to both CA1 and DG. These data suggest that GluK1 KARs regulate functional connectivity between the excitatory neurons, possibly via morphological changes in glutamatergic circuit, affecting synchronization of neuronal populations. The significant effects of GluK1 manipulations on network activity call for further research on GluK1 KAR as potential targets for antiepileptic treatments, particularly during the early postnatal development when GluK1 KARs are strongly expressed in the limbic neural networks.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)