Back to Search Start Over

Immunogenicity of High-Dose Versus MF59-Adjuvanted Versus Standard Influenza Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The Swiss/Spanish Trial in Solid Organ Transplantation on Prevention of Influenza (STOP-FLU Trial).

Authors :
Mombelli M
Neofytos D
Huynh-Do U
Sánchez-Céspedes J
Stampf S
Golshayan D
Dahdal S
Stirnimann G
Schnyder A
Garzoni C
Venzin RM
Magenta L
Schönenberger M
Walti L
Hirzel C
Munting A
Dickenmann M
Koller M
Aubert JD
Steiger J
Pascual M
Mueller TF
Schuurmans M
Berger C
Binet I
Villard J
Mueller NJ
Egli A
Cordero E
van Delden C
Manuel O
Source :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Clin Infect Dis] 2024 Jan 25; Vol. 78 (1), pp. 48-56.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The immunogenicity of the standard influenza vaccine is reduced in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, so new vaccination strategies are needed in this population.<br />Methods: Adult SOT recipients from 9 transplant clinics in Switzerland and Spain were enrolled if they were >3 months after transplantation. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to a MF59-adjuvanted or a high-dose vaccine (intervention), or a standard vaccine (control), with stratification by organ and time from transplant. The primary outcome was vaccine response rate, defined as a ≥4-fold increase of hemagglutination-inhibition titers to at least 1 vaccine strain at 28 days postvaccination. Secondary outcomes included polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza and vaccine reactogenicity.<br />Results: A total of 619 patients were randomized, 616 received the assigned vaccines, and 598 had serum available for analysis of the primary endpoint (standard, n = 198; MF59-adjuvanted, n = 205; high-dose, n = 195 patients). Vaccine response rates were 42% (84/198) in the standard vaccine group, 60% (122/205) in the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine group, and 66% (129/195) in the high-dose vaccine group (difference in intervention vaccines vs standard vaccine, 0.20; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], .12-1); P < .001; difference in high-dose vs standard vaccine, 0.24 [95% CI, .16-1]; P < .001; difference in MF59-adjuvanted vs standard vaccine, 0.17 [97.5% CI, .08-1]; P < .001). Influenza occurred in 6% of the standard, 5% in the MF59-adjuvanted, and 7% in the high-dose vaccine groups. Vaccine-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the intervention vaccine groups, but most of the events were mild.<br />Conclusions: In SOT recipients, use of an MF59-adjuvanted or a high-dose influenza vaccine was safe and resulted in a higher vaccine response rate.<br />Clinical Trials Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03699839.<br />Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. O. M. reports receiving grants from Lophius Bioscience and participated in advisory boards of Takeda and MSD. N. J. M. reports receiving grants from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study, receiving support for attending a meeting by Biotest, and participating in the board of the Swiss Society for Infectious Diseases. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-6591
Volume :
78
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37584344
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad477