Back to Search Start Over

The McKenzie Method versus guideline-based advice in the treatment of sciatica: 24-month outcomes of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors :
Kilpikoski S
Häkkinen AH
Repo JP
Kyrölä K
Multanen J
Kankaanpää M
Vainionpää A
Takala EP
Kautiainen H
Ylinen J
Source :
Clinical rehabilitation [Clin Rehabil] 2024 Jan; Vol. 38 (1), pp. 72-84. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 21.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a McKenzie Method intervention in patients with sciatica with guideline-based patient education.<br />Design: Multi-centre, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomised trial.<br />Setting: Two tertiary hospitals providing operative spinal care.<br />Subjects: Sciatica patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbar disc herniation compressing a nerve root.<br />Interventions: The McKenzie group received specific back exercises for seven visits combined with an educational book, and the Control group received a single session of self-management guidance according to usual practices.<br />Main Measures: The primary outcome was the number of surgical operations. Secondary outcomes were pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale, disability using the Oswestry Disability Index and health-related quality of life using a RAND-36 questionnaire at baseline and 24-month follow-up.<br />Results: Altogether 66 patients, mean age of 43 years, of which 50% were females with long-lasting sciatica, mean 16 weeks, were randomised to two groups. Nineteen patients (29%) had surgery. There was no significant difference in surgery rates between the groups. Back and leg pain decreased, and disability improved in both groups. Health-related quality of life improved in six dimensions out of eight in both groups. There were no significant between-group changes in the patient-reported outcomes at the follow-up.<br />Conclusions: Multiple sessions of McKenzie-based back exercises with a McKenzie-specific patient's educational book produced effects equal to guideline-based advice at long-term follow-up. However, the power of these results is diminished due to the small patient population and confounding factors.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1477-0873
Volume :
38
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37605454
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155231196393