Back to Search Start Over

How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: a comprehensive review.

Authors :
Panthier F
Kutchukian S
Ducousso H
Doizi S
Solano C
Candela L
Corrales M
Chicaud M
Traxer O
Hautekeete S
Tailly T
Source :
Actas urologicas espanolas [Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)] 2024 Jan-Feb; Vol. 48 (1), pp. 71-78. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 30.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy [URS], extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL] and percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment.<br />Material and Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction.<br />Results: In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20 mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL.<br />Conclusions: Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English; Spanish; Castilian
ISSN :
2173-5786
Volume :
48
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Actas urologicas espanolas
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37657708
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.009