Validation of different predictive scoring scales in patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy related to neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis.

Objective: To validate the different predictive scoring scales in the Chinese population with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology related to neuronal surface antibody (Ab)-mediated autoimmune encephalitis (AE).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 174 consecutive patients from October 2018 to December 2022, whose serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples were tested for neuronal surface Abs. The antibody prevalence in epilepsy and encephalopathy (APE2), antibodies contributing to focal epilepsy signs and symptoms (ACES), "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing in epilepsy or seizures (ONES) checklist, and the combinations were used to validate the predictive models of neuronal surface Ab-mediated AE.
Results: A total of 139 patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology were enrolled. Abs were detected in 37 patients (26.6%). The APE2/ONES reflex score had the highest sensitivity (89.2%) and lowest specificity (41.7%). The ACES score had the lowest sensitivity (67.5%) and highest specificity (64.7%). Variations in the performance were observed in the different types of AE. 100% of patients with anti-γ-aminobutyric acid B-B receptor encephalitis were predicted by ONES, APE2/ONES reflex, and ACES/ONES reflex scores. Only 75% of patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis were predicted by the APE2/ONES and ACES/ONES reflex scores.
Conclusion: Our study was the first to validate various predictive scoring scales in the Chinese cohort of patients with new-onset epileptic seizures or epilepsy of unknown etiology related to neuronal surface Ab-mediated AE. Based upon clinical suspicion, more than one scoring scale should be performed to predict the chance of AE in those patients.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)