Back to Search Start Over

Survival With Favorable Neurologic Outcome and Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children With Cardiac Disease Compared With Noncardiac Disease.

Authors :
Federman M
Sutton RM
Reeder RW
Ahmed T
Bell MJ
Berg RA
Bishop R
Bochkoris M
Burns C
Carcillo JA
Carpenter TC
Dean JM
Diddle JW
Fernandez R
Fink EL
Franzon D
Frazier AH
Friess SH
Graham K
Hall M
Hehir DA
Horvat CM
Huard LL
Kirkpatrick T
Maa T
Maitoza LA
Manga A
McQuillen PS
Meert KL
Morgan RW
Mourani PM
Nadkarni VM
Notterman D
Palmer CA
Pollack MM
Sapru A
Schneiter C
Sharron MP
Srivastava N
Tilford B
Viteri S
Wessel D
Wolfe HA
Yates AR
Zuppa AF
Naim MY
Source :
Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies [Pediatr Crit Care Med] 2024 Jan 01; Vol. 25 (1), pp. 4-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives: To assess associations between outcome and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in children with medical cardiac, surgical cardiac, or noncardiac disease.<br />Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster randomized trial, the ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT02837497, 2016-2021).<br />Setting: Eighteen PICUs.<br />Patients: Children less than or equal to 18 years old and greater than or equal to 37 weeks postconceptual age receiving chest compressions (CC) of any duration during the study.<br />Interventions: None.<br />Measurements and Main Results: Of 1,100 children with IHCA, there were 273 medical cardiac (25%), 383 surgical cardiac (35%), and 444 noncardiac (40%) cases. Favorable neurologic outcome was defined as no more than moderate disability or no worsening from baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category at discharge. The medical cardiac group had lower odds of survival with favorable neurologic outcomes compared with the noncardiac group (48% vs 55%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI], aOR 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.87], p = 0.008) and surgical cardiac group (48% vs 58%; aOR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.45-0.9], p = 0.01). We failed to identify a difference in favorable outcomes between surgical cardiac and noncardiac groups. We also failed to identify differences in CC rate, CC fraction, ventilation rate, intra-arrest average target diastolic or systolic blood pressure between medical cardiac versus noncardiac, and surgical cardiac versus noncardiac groups. The surgical cardiac group had lower odds of achieving target CC depth compared to the noncardiac group (OR 0.15 [95% CI, 0.02-0.52], p = 0.001). We failed to identify a difference in the percentage of patients achieving target CC depth when comparing medical cardiac versus noncardiac groups.<br />Conclusions: In pediatric IHCA, medical cardiac patients had lower odds of survival with favorable neurologic outcomes compared with noncardiac and surgical cardiac patients. We failed to find differences in CPR quality between medical cardiac and noncardiac patients, but there were lower odds of achieving target CC depth in surgical cardiac compared to noncardiac patients.<br />Competing Interests: This study was funded by the following grants from the National Institute of Health National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: R01HL131544, R01HD049934, UG1HD049981, UG1HD049983, UG1050096, UG1HD063108, UG1HD083166, UG1HD083170, UG1HD083171, and K23HL148541. Drs. Sutton and Manga’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Drs. Sutton, Reeder, Bell, Berg, Carcillo, Carpenter, Dean, Fernandez, Fink, Frazier, Friess, Graham, Hall, Horvat, Manga, McQuillen, Meert, Morgan, Mourani, Nadkarni, Pollack, Sapru, Schneiter, Wessel, Yates, Zuppa, and Naim received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Drs. Reeder, Bell, Berg, Carcillo, Carpenter, Dean, Fink, Friess, Hall, Meert, Morgan, Mourani, Nadkarni, Pollack, Sapru, Wessel, Yates, Zuppa, and Naim’s institutions received funding from the NIH. Dr. Carcillo’s institution received funding from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Dr. Diddle received funding from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals via his institution. Dr. Fink’s institution received funding from the Neurocritical Care Society; she received funding from the American Board of Pediatrics. Dr. Franzon’s institution received funding from ICU-RESUScitation/Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Dr. Hall received funding from Abbvie and Kiadis. Drs. Horvat, Maa, Manga, McQuillen, and Schneiter’s institutions received funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Dr. Nadkarni’s institution received funding from Laerdal Foundation-RQI Programs, Nihon-Kohden, Philips, Defibtech, and HeartHero; he received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine as President (2023–2024) and the NIH; he disclosed that he is a volunteer for Citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation Foundation Board, the American Heart Association Committees, and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Board. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1529-7535
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37678381
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003368