Back to Search
Start Over
Cardiac Death After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Contemporary Devices.
- Source :
-
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2023 Sep 25; Vol. 16 (18), pp. 2277-2290. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Background: The burden of cardiac death after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly from advanced heart failure (HF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), remains largely unknown.<br />Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the incidence and predictors of SCD and HF-related death in TAVR recipients treated with newer-generation devices.<br />Methods: This study included a total of 5,421 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with newer-generation devices using balloon (75.7%) or self-expandable (24.3%) valves.<br />Results: After a median follow-up of 2 (IQR: 1-3) years, 976 (18.0%) patients had died, 50.8% from cardiovascular causes. Advanced HF and SCD accounted for 11.6% and 7.5% of deaths, respectively. Independent predictors of HF-related death were atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.47-3.22; P < 0.001), prior pacemaker (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.10-2.92; P = 0.01), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 1.08 per 5% decrease; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14; P = 0.02), transthoracic approach (HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.37-4.55; P = 0.003), and new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.14-3.02; P = 0.01). Two baseline characteristics (diabetes, HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.13-2.89; P = 0.01; and chronic kidney disease, HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.02-2.90; P = 0.04) and 3 procedural findings (valve in valve, HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.01-4.64; P = 0.04; transarterial nontransfemoral approach, HR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.23-4.48; P = 0.01; and periprocedural ventricular arrhythmia, HR: 7.19; 95% CI: 2.61-19.76; P < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of SCD after TAVR.<br />Conclusions: Advanced HF and SCD accounted for a fifth of deaths after TAVR in contemporary practice. Potentially treatable factors leading to increased risk of HF deaths and SCD were identified, such as arrhythmia/dyssynchrony factors for HF and valve-in-valve TAVR or periprocedural ventricular arrhythmias for SCD.<br />Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Mesnier was supported by a research grant from Fédération Française de Cardiologie. Dr Belahnech was supported by a research grant from Aula Vall d’Hebron. Dr Rodés-Cabau holds the Research Chair “Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière” for the Development of Structural Heart Disease Interventions; and has received institutional research grants and consultant/speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr Ternacle has served as a consultant for Abbott. Dr Modine has served as a consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Nombela-Franco has served as a proctor for Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Reguiero has served as a proctor for Abbott. Dr Himbert has served as a proctor for Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Asmarats has received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Stroke Volume
Risk Factors
Ventricular Function, Left
Treatment Outcome
Arrhythmias, Cardiac therapy
Death, Sudden, Cardiac epidemiology
Death, Sudden, Cardiac etiology
Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve surgery
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects
Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1876-7605
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 18
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 37758382
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.015