Back to Search Start Over

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group.

Authors :
Ortner G
Somani BK
Güven S
Kitzbichler G
Traxer O
Giusti G
Proietti S
Liatsikos E
Kallidonis P
Ulvik Ø
Goumas IK
Duvdevani M
Baard J
Kamphuis GM
Ferretti S
Dragos L
Villa L
Miernik A
Tailly T
Pietropaolo A
Hamri SB
Papatsoris A
Gözen AS
Herrmann TRW
Nagele U
Tokas T
Source :
World journal of urology [World J Urol] 2023 Nov; Vol. 41 (11), pp. 3367-3376. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 01.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: To highlight and compare experts' laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists.<br />Methods: Following a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery.<br />Results: Twenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities.<br />Conclusion: Ho:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-8726
Volume :
41
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
World journal of urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37777981
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04632-4