Diagnostic utility of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and needle-core biopsy sampling of canine splenic masses.

This prospective clinical study sought to determine the accuracy of cytopathologic examination and needle-core biopsy (NCB) against diagnoses obtained by excisional histopathology (EH) for canine splenic masses. Twenty-five masses were evaluated ex vivo by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and NCB tissue sampling. Each spleen was placed in a container and artificial skin placed over its surface. Ultrasound-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle and 2 NCB samples [14-gauge (NCB-14), 16-gauge (NCB-16)] were obtained and submitted for analysis. Results were compared to results obtained by splenic excisional histopathology (EH). There was no difference noted between FNA, NCB-14, or NCB-16 analyses. In addition, there was no difference in accuracy between FNA and NCB-14 or between FNA and NCB-14 versus NCB-16. Reported accuracy of FNA was 0.72, NCB-14 was 0.72, and NCB-16 was 0.64, respectively. Both FNA and NCB-14 displayed a sensitivity of 71% and NCB-16 a sensitivity of 53%. Both FNA and NCB-14 displayed a specificity of 75% and NCB-16 a specificity of 88%. The results demonstrated that NCB had no advantage clinically over FNA at diagnosing splenic pathology. This study further demonstrates that preoperative diagnostic evaluation of the spleen is not highly accurate and cannot be recommended prior to splenectomy.
(Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.)