Back to Search Start Over

Berzosertib Plus Topotecan vs Topotecan Alone in Patients With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Takahashi N
Hao Z
Villaruz LC
Zhang J
Ruiz J
Petty WJ
Mamdani H
Riess JW
Nieva J
Pachecho JM
Fuld AD
Shum E
Chauhan A
Nichols S
Shimellis H
McGlone J
Sciuto L
Pinkiert D
Graham C
Shelat M
Kattappuram R
Abel M
Schroeder B
Upadhyay D
Krishnamurthy M
Sharma AK
Kumar R
Malin J
Schultz CW
Goyal S
Redon CE
Pommier Y
Aladjem MI
Gore SD
Steinberg SM
Vilimas R
Desai P
Thomas A
Source :
JAMA oncology [JAMA Oncol] 2023 Dec 01; Vol. 9 (12), pp. 1669-1677.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Importance: Patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a high replication stress tumor, have poor prognoses and few therapeutic options. A phase 2 study showed antitumor activity with the addition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase inhibitor berzosertib to topotecan.<br />Objective: To investigate whether the addition of berzosertib to topotecan improves clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed SCLC.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: Between December 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, this open-label phase 2 randomized clinical trial recruited 60 patients with SCLC and relapse after 1 or more prior therapies from 16 US cancer centers. Patients previously treated with topotecan were not eligible.<br />Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive topotecan alone (group 1), 1.25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 through 5, or with berzosertib (group 2), 210 mg/m2 intravenously on days 2 and 5, in 21-day cycles. Randomization was stratified by tumor sensitivity to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) in the overall population and among patients with platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant tumors. The PFS and OS for each treatment group were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare PFS and OS between the 2 groups, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the treatment hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI.<br />Results: Of 60 patients (median [range] age, 59 [34-79] years; 33 [55%] male) included in this study, 20 were randomly assigned to receive topotecan alone and 40 to receive a combination of topotecan with berzosertib. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 21.3 (18.1-28.3) months, there was no difference in PFS between the 2 groups (median, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-5.1] months for group 1 vs 3.9 [95% CI, 2.8-4.6] months for group 2; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.46-1.41]; Pā€‰=ā€‰.44). Overall survival was significantly longer with the combination therapy (5.4 [95% CI, 3.2-6.8] months vs 8.9 [95% CI, 4.8-11.4] months; HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.29-0.96], Pā€‰=ā€‰.03). Adverse event profiles were similar between the 2 groups (eg, grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, 11 of 20 [55%] vs 20 of 40 [50%], and any grade nausea, 9 of 20 [45%] vs 14 of 40 [35%]).<br />Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with berzosertib plus topotecan did not improve PFS compared with topotecan therapy alone among patients with relapsed SCLC. However, the combination treatment significantly improved OS.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03896503.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2374-2445
Volume :
9
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37824137
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4025