Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcome prediction of acute neurological patients admitted to the emergency department: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and modified SOFA score.

Authors :
Donoso-Calero MI
Sanz-García A
Polonio-López B
Maestre Miquel C
Durantez Fernández C
Mordillo-Mateos L
Mohedano-Moriano A
Conty-Serrano R
Otero-Agra M
Jorge-Soto C
Martín-Conty JL
Martín-Rodríguez F
Source :
Frontiers in public health [Front Public Health] 2023 Oct 30; Vol. 11, pp. 1264159. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 30 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA) and modified SOFA score (mSOFA) as predictive tools for 2-day and 28-day mortality and ICU admission in patients with acute neurological pathology treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs).<br />Methods: An observational, prospective cohort study in adults with acute neurological disease transferred by ambulance to an ED was conducted from 1 January 2019 to 31 August 2022 in five hospitals in Castilla-León (Spain). Score discrimination was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the score.<br />Results: A total of 640 adult patients with neurological disease were included. For the prediction of 2-day mortality (all-cause), mSOFA presented a higher AUC than SOFA (mSOFA = 0.925 vs. SOFA = 0.902). This was not the case for 28-day mortality, for which SOFA was higher than mSOFA (mSOFA = 0.852 vs. SOFA = 0.875). Finally, ICU admission showed that SOFA was higher than mSOFA (mSOFA = 0.834 vs. SOFA = 0.845).<br />Conclusion: Both mSOFA and SOFA presented similar predictive ability, with mSOFA being the best predictor for short-term mortality and SOFA being the best predictor for medium-term mortality, as well as for ICU admission. These results in a cohort of patients with acute neurological pathology pave the way for the use of both predictive tools in the ED. The inclusion of these tools could improve the clinical assessment and further treatment of neurological patients, who commonly present the worst outcomes.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Donoso-Calero, Sanz-García, Polonio-López, Maestre Miquel, Durantez Fernández, Mordillo-Mateos, Mohedano-Moriano, Conty-Serrano, Otero-Agra, Jorge-Soto, Martín-Conty and Martín-Rodríguez.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2296-2565
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in public health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37965516
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264159