Back to Search Start Over

Preliminary Investigation on Efficacy and Safety of Substance P-Coated Stent for Promoting Re-Endothelialization: A Porcine Coronary Artery Restenosis Model.

Authors :
Park DS
Oh S
Jin YJ
Na MH
Kim M
Kim JH
Hyun DY
Cho KH
Hong YJ
Kim JH
Ahn Y
Hermida-Prieto M
Vázquez-Rodríguez JM
Gutiérrez-Chico JL
Mariñas-Pardo L
Lim KS
Park JK
Byeon DH
Cho YN
Kee SJ
Sim DS
Jeong MH
Source :
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [Tissue Eng Regen Med] 2024 Jan; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 53-64. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 16.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Current polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DESs) have fundamental issues about inflammation and delayed re-endothelializaton of the vessel wall. Substance-P (SP), which plays an important role in inflammation and endothelial cells, has not yet been applied to coronary stents. Therefore, this study compares poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based everolimus-eluting stents (PLGA-EESs) versus 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-based SP-eluting stents (MPC-SPs) in in-vitro and in-vivo models.<br />Methods: The morphology of the stent surface and peptide/drug release kinetics from stents were evaluated. The in-vitro proliferative effect of SP released from MPC-SP is evaluated using human umbilical vein endothelial cell. Finally, the safety and efficacy of the stent are evaluated after inserting it into a pig's coronary artery.<br />Results: Similar to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP had a uniform surface morphology with very thin coating layer thickness (2.074 μm). MPC-SP showed sustained drug release of SP for over 2 weeks. Endothelial cell proliferation was significantly increased in groups treated with SP (n = 3) compared with the control (n = 3) and those with everolimus (n = 3) (SP: 118.9 ± 7.61% vs. everolimus: 64.3 ± 12.37% vs. the control: 100 ± 6.64%, p < 0.05). In the animal study, the percent stenosis was higher in MPC-SP group (n = 7) compared to PLGA-EES group (n = 7) (MPC-SP: 28.6 ± 10.7% vs. PLGA-EES: 16.7 ± 6.3%, p < 0.05). MPC-SP group showed, however, lower inflammation (MPC-SP: 0.3 ± 0.26 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.2 ± 0.48, p < 0.05) and fibrin deposition (MPC-SP: 1.0 ± 0.73 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.5 ± 0.59, p < 0.05) around the stent strut. MPC-SP showed more increased expression of cluster of differentiation 31, suggesting enhanced re-endothelialization.<br />Conclusion: Compared to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP demonstrated more decreased inflammation of the vascular wall and enhanced re-endothelialization and stent coverage. Hence, MPC-SP has the potential therapeutic benefits for the treatment of coronary artery disease by solving limitations of currently available DESs.<br /> (© 2023. Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2212-5469
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37973692
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-023-00608-y