Back to Search Start Over

Results of Patch Testing to Botanicals: Review of the Mayo Clinic Experience Over 2 Decades (1997-2017).

Authors :
Bangalore-Kumar A
Jin MF
Kunkel H
Sathe N
Hall MR
Drage LA
Youssef M
Yang YW
Yiannias JA
Killian J
Davis MDP
Source :
Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug [Dermatitis] 2024 Jan-Feb; Vol. 35 (1), pp. 43-48. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 24.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Botanicals are increasingly incorporated into skincare products. Although allergic contact dermatitis due to botanicals is recognized, data describing the prevalence of positive patch tests to botanicals are sparse. Objective: To report the Mayo Clinic experience of patch testing to selected botanical products in the standard, extended standard, fragrance, and plant series. Methods: IRB-approved retrospective study of the Mayo Clinic experience with patch testing to botanicals from 1997 to 2017. Results: In total, 12,169 people were patch tested to botanicals in the standard, extended standard, fragrance, and plant series; 4032 were men and 8137 were women. The mean age of the population tested was 54 (standard deviation 17.7) years. Almost 11% (1320/12,169) of the patch-tested population exhibited positive reactions to at least 1 botanical agent. Myroxylon pereirae resin 25% was the most common positive allergen in the series. Patients who had positive reactions to at least 1 botanical agent were more (19.8%) likely to have a positive reaction to at least 1 additional botanical than those patients who did not have any positive tests. Most patients presented with generalized involvement (334) or involvement of the hands (284) or face (232). Conclusion: Physicians should be aware of the high prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and patch test positivity associated with botanical products.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2162-5220
Volume :
35
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38011689
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2023.0109