Back to Search Start Over

Are JAKis more effective among elderly patients with RA, smokers and those with higher cardiovascular risk? A comparative effectiveness study of b/tsDMARDs in Sweden.

Are JAKis more effective among elderly patients with RA, smokers and those with higher cardiovascular risk? A comparative effectiveness study of b/tsDMARDs in Sweden.

Authors :
Bower H
Frisell T
di Giuseppe D
Delcoigne B
Lindström U
Turesson C
Chatzidionysiou K
Lindqvist E
Knight A
Forsblad-d'Elia H
Askling J
Source :
RMD open [RMD Open] 2023 Dec 26; Vol. 9 (4). Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 26.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether the relative effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis differ by the presence or absence of risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) disease, age, sex and smoking.<br />Methods: Through Swedish registers, we identified 13 493 individuals with 3166 JAKi, 5575 non-TNFi and 11 286 TNFi treatment initiations 2016-2022. All lines of therapy were included, with the majority in second line or higher. Treatment response was defined as the proportion reaching European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) good response and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission, respectively, within 6 months. Crude percentage point differences in these proportions (JAKis, and non-TNFis, vs TNFis) overall and by risk factors were observed, and adjusted for confounders using linear regression models. Predicted probabilities of response and remission were estimated from adjusted Poisson models, and presented across CV risk and age.<br />Results: Overall, adjusted percentage point differences indicated higher response (+5.0%, 95% CI 2.2% to 7.9%) and remission (+5.8%, 95% CI 3.2% to 8.5%) with JAKis versus TNFis. The adjusted percentage point differences for response in those above 65, at elevated CV risk, and smokers were +5.9% (95% CI 2.7% to 9.0%), +8.3% (95% CI 5.3% to 11.4%) and +6.0% (95% CI 3.3% to 8.7%), respectively. The corresponding estimates for remission were +8.0% (95% CI 5.3% to 10.8%), +5.6% (95% CI 3.0% to 8.2%) and +7.6% (95% CI 5.5% to 9.7%).<br />Conclusions: As used in clinical practice, response and remission at 6 months with JAKis are higher than with TNFi. Among patients with risk factors of concern, effectiveness is similar or numerically further increased. For individualised benefit-to-risk ratios to guide treatment choice, safety and effectiveness in specific patient segments should be considered.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: Karolinska Institutet, with JA as principal investigator, has or has had research agreements with AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB, mainly in the context of safety monitoring of biologics via ARTIS/Swedish Biologics Register. CT has received speaker fees from AbbVie, BMS, Nordic Drugs, Pfizer and Roche.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2056-5933
Volume :
9
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
RMD open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38151264
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003648