Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of LC-MS-based methods for the determination of carboxylic acids in animal matrices.

Authors :
Schwartz-Zimmermann HE
Hündler M
Reiterer N
Ricci S
Rivera-Chacon R
Castillo-Lopez E
Zebeli Q
Berthiller F
Source :
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry [Anal Bioanal Chem] 2024 Feb; Vol. 416 (5), pp. 1199-1215. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 05.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Carboxylic acids (CAs) are key players in human and animal metabolism. As they are hardly retained under reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) conditions in their native form, derivatization is an option to make them accessible to RP-LC and simultaneously increase their response for mass spectrometric detection. In this work, two RP-LC tandem mass spectrometry-based methods using aniline or 3-nitrophenylhydrazine (3-NPH) as derivatization agents were compared with respect to several factors including completeness of derivatization, apparent recoveries (R <subscript>A</subscript> s) in both cow feces and ruminal fluid, and concentrations obtained in feces and ruminal fluid of cows. Anion exchange chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (AIC-HR-MS) served as reference method. Derivatization efficiencies were close to 100% for 3-NPH derivatization but variable (20-100%) and different in solvent solutions and matrix extracts for aniline derivatization. Likewise, average R <subscript>A</subscript> s of <superscript>13</superscript> C-labeled short-chain fatty acids as internal standards were around 100% for 3-NPH derivatization but only 45% for aniline derivatization. Quantification of CAs in feces and ruminal fluid of cows initially fed a forage-only diet and then transitioned to a 65% high-grain diet which yielded similar concentrations for 3-NPH derivatization and AIC-HR-MS, but concentrations determined by aniline derivatization were on average five times lower. For these reasons, derivatization with aniline is not recommended for the quantitative analysis of CAs in animal samples.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1618-2650
Volume :
416
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38177453
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-05113-8