Back to Search Start Over

Short-Stay Units vs Routine Admission From the Emergency Department in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: The SSU-AHF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Pang PS
Berger DA
Mahler SA
Li X
Pressler SJ
Lane KA
Bischof JJ
Char D
Diercks D
Jones AE
Hess EP
Levy P
Miller JB
Venkat A
Harrison NE
Collins SP
Source :
JAMA network open [JAMA Netw Open] 2024 Jan 02; Vol. 7 (1), pp. e2350511. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Importance: More than 80% of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure (AHF) are hospitalized. With more than 1 million annual hospitalizations for AHF in the US, safe and effective alternatives are needed. Care for AHF in short-stay units (SSUs) may be safe and more efficient than hospitalization, especially for lower-risk patients, but randomized clinical trial data are lacking.<br />Objective: To compare the effectiveness of SSU care vs hospitalization in lower-risk patients with AHF.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial randomly assigned low-risk patients with AHF 1:1 to SSU or hospital admission from the ED. Patients received follow-up at 30 and 90 days post discharge. The study began December 6, 2017, and was completed on July 22, 2021. The data were analyzed between March 27, 2020, and November 11, 2023.<br />Intervention: Randomized post-ED disposition to less than 24 hours of SSU care vs hospitalization.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: The study was designed to detect at least 1-day superiority for a primary outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOOH) at 30-day follow-up for 534 participants, with an allowance of 10% participant attrition. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment was truncated at 194 participants. Before unmasking, the primary outcome was changed from DAOOH to an outcome with adequate statistical power: quality of life as measured by the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). The KCCQ-12 scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.<br />Results: Of the 193 patients enrolled (1 was found ineligible after randomization), the mean (SD) age was 64.8 (14.8) years, 79 (40.9%) were women, and 114 (59.1%) were men. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. The mean (SD) KCCQ-12 summary score between the SSU and hospitalization arms at 30 days was 51.3 (25.7) vs 45.8 (23.8) points, respectively (Pā€‰=ā€‰.19). Participants in the SSU arm had 1.6 more DAOOH at 30-day follow-up than those in the hospitalization arm (median [IQR], 26.9 [24.4-28.8] vs 25.4 [22.0-27.7] days; Pā€‰=ā€‰.02). Adverse events were uncommon and similar in both arms.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The findings show that the SSU strategy was no different than hospitalization with regard to KCCQ-12 score, superior for more DAOOH, and safe for lower-risk patients with AHF. These findings of lower health care utilization with the SSU strategy need to be definitively tested in an adequately powered study.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03302910.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2574-3805
Volume :
7
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA network open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38198141
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50511