Back to Search Start Over

Current and emerging treatment approaches for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors :
Jhaveri K
Marmé F
Source :
Cancer treatment reviews [Cancer Treat Rev] 2024 Feb; Vol. 123, pp. 102670. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 09.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In the past decade, significant progress was made in treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but many clinical questions remain. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are now widely used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as standard of care, having demonstrated significant progression-free survival versus ET, and also significant overall survival benefits in the metastatic setting. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR intracellular signaling pathway coupled with ET typically follows first-line therapies. Novel endocrine options including oral selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) are in late phases of development, with elacestrant being the first oral SERD to be approved for ESR1-mutant mBC. However, endocrine-refractory disease is inevitable in most patients and represents an area of unmet need, with current recommended options offering poor efficacy, undesirable toxicity, and reduced quality of life. Breakthrough advances in the metastatic setting came via the development of antibody-drug conjugates, which have the advantage of delivering cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells with higher tumor selectivity. Trastuzumab deruxtecan offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC and sacituzumab govitecan is a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, including those with unmet treatment need in the later-line endocrine-refractory setting. Data gaps still exist regarding optimal sequencing of these novel agents; additional studies into mechanisms of resistance in the metastatic setting would provide further insights. Herein, we describe the current treatment options for HR+/HER2- mBC, including the latest practice-impacting data, and provide commentary on future directions.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Jhaveri has received consulting/advisory board fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jounce Therapeutics, Taiho Oncology, Genentech/Roche, AbbVie, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicine, Daiichi Sankyo, Seattle Genetics, Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Stemline/Menarini, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company Ltd, Scorpion Therapeutics; and has received research funding from Novartis, Genentech, AstraZeneca, ADC Therapeutics, Novita Pharmaceuticals, Debiopharm, Pfizer, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Zymeworks, Gilead, PUMA Biotechnology, Scorpion Therapeutics and Merck Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Marmé reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Tesaro, Novartis, Amgen, PharmaMar, Genomic Health, CureVac, EISAI, Clovis, Gilead/Immunomedics, GSK, MSD, Seagen, Myriad, Pierre-Fabre, Daiichi- Sankyo, outside the submitted work.<br /> (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-1967
Volume :
123
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer treatment reviews
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38211404
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102670