Back to Search
Start Over
Housekeeping Gene Stability in Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Cultivated in Serum/Xeno-Free Media for Osteoarthritis.
- Source :
-
Cells [Cells] 2024 Jan 16; Vol. 13 (2). Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 16. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Among the available therapeutics for the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)-based products appear to be the most promising. Alongside minimally manipulated cell-based orthobiologics, where MSCs are the engine of the bioactive properties, cell expansion under good manufacturing practice (GMP) settings is actively studied to obtain clinical-grade pure populations able to concentrate the biological activity. One of the main characteristics of GMP protocols is the use of clinical-grade reagents, including the recently released serum-free/xeno-free (SFM/XFM) synthetic media, which differ significantly from the traditional reagents like those based on fetal bovine serum (FBS). As SFM/XFM are still poorly characterized, a main lack is the notion of reliable housekeeping genes (HKGs) for molecular studies, either standalone or in combination with standard conditions. Indeed, the aim of this work was to test the stability of five commonly used HKGs ( ACTB , EF1A , GAPDH , RPLP0 , and TBP ) in adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) cultivated in two commercially available SFM/XFM and to compare outcomes with those obtained in FBS. Four different applets widely recognized by the scientific community (NormFinder, geNorm, comparative ΔCt method, and BestKeeper) were used and data were merged to obtain a final stability order. The analysis showed that cells cultured in both synthetic media had a similar ranking for HKGs stability ( GAPDH being best), albeit divergent from FBS expanded products ( EF1A at top). Moreover, it was possible to identify specific HKGs for side by side studies, with EF1A / TBP being the most reliable normalizers for single SFM/XFM vs. FBS cultured cells and TBP the best one for a comprehensive analysis of all samples. In addition, stability of HKGs was donor-dependent. The normalization effect on selected genes coding for factors known to be involved in OA pathology, and whose amount should be carefully considered for the selection of the most appropriate MSC-based treatment, showed how HKGs choice might affect the perceived amount for the different media or donor. Overall, this work confirms the impact of SFM/XFM conditions on HKGs stability performance, which resulted similarly for both synthetic media analyzed in the study.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2073-4409
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Cells
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38247858
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13020167