The Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Antibiotics for the Treatment of Bronchiectasis in Adults: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Inhaled antibiotics are recommended conditionally by international bronchiectasis guidelines for the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis, but results of individual studies are inconsistent. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics in bronchiectasis. Subsequent publications have supplemented the existing body of evidence further in this area.
Research Question: To what extent do inhaled antibiotics demonstrate both efficacy and safety as a treatment option for adults with bronchiectasis?
Study Design and Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of inhaled antibiotics in adult patients with bronchiectasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for eligible studies. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT imaging and had a treatment duration of at least 4 weeks. The primary end point was exacerbation frequency, with additional key efficacy end points including severe exacerbations, bacterial load, symptoms, quality of life, and FEV ₁ . Data were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis.
Results: Twenty studies involving 3,468 patients were included. Inhaled antibiotics were associated with reduced number of patients with exacerbations (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96), a slight reduction in exacerbation frequency (rate ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91), a probable reduction in the frequency of severe exacerbations (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74), and a likely slight increase in time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94). Inhaled antibiotics likely lead to a slight increase in the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis respiratory symptom score (mean difference, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.44-4.31) and may reduce scores on the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (mean difference, -3.13; 95% CI, -5.93 to -0.32). Bacterial load consistently was reduced, but FEV ₁ was not changed with treatment. Evidence suggests little to no difference in adverse effects between groups (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.30). Antibiotic-resistant organisms likely were increased by treatment.
Interpretation: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, inhaled antibiotics resulted in a slight reduction in exacerbations, a probable reduction in severe exacerbations, and a likely slight improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adults with bronchiectasis.
Trial Registry: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42023384694; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: H. C. reports grants or contracts from the Korean Ministry of Education Basic Science Research Program [Grant 2021R1I1A3052416]; consulting fees from Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. C. S. H. reports consulting fees from 30 Technology, Aradigm, CSL Behring, Chiesi, Gilead, Grifols, GSK, Insmed, Janssen, LifeArc, Meiji, Mylan, Novartis, Pneumagen, Shionogi, Teva, Vertex, and Zambon (personal fees); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Chiesi, Insmed; and payment for expert testimony from Zambon. J. D. C. has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Novartis, Insmed, and Trudell and has received consultancy or speaker fees from Antabio, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Trudell, and Zambon. None declared (R. C.).
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)