Back to Search Start Over

Challenges in the assessment of epithelial dysplasia in oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesion: Inter and intra-observer variability of the WHO criteria and binary system.

Authors :
Marques LC
Montovani PP
Gonçalves LS
Cunha KS
Junior AS
Conde DC
Source :
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry [J Clin Exp Dent] 2024 Jan 01; Vol. 16 (1), pp. e62-e70. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 01 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Assessment of oral epithelial dysplasia is the gold standard for investigating the risk of malignant progression. The World Health Organization (WHO) methods and the binary system have limitations. This study assess the inter- and intra-observer variability of the architectural and cytological criteria and the classification of the presence and degree of epithelial dysplasia in oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesion (OLL), using both the 2017 WHO criteria and the binary system.<br />Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 65 biopsies from lesions classified as OLP and OLL according to the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (AAOMP) criteria. The histological slides were reevaluated by two oral pathologists.<br />Results: The individual alterations with most inter-observer disagreement were atypical mitotic figures (43.1%), loss of cohesion between epithelial cells (38.5%) and drop shape rete ridges ridges (38.5%). Inter-observer agreement analysis did not show statistically significant agreement regarding the classification of epithelial dysplasia grade by WHO criteria, only regarding the binary system classification (k=0.257; p =0.035). Intra-observer agreement analysis by evaluator 1 showed that the classification of epithelial dysplasia grade according to both methods had statistically significant agreement (k=0.546; p =0.004, k=0.861; p <0.001). Considering evaluator 2, only the evaluation of the WHO system classification showed statistically significant agreement (k=0.593; p =0.010).<br />Conclusions: The evaluation of epithelial dysplasia is subjective and focal changes and inflammatory infiltrate, characteristic of OLP and OLL, can increase the degree of disagreement among evaluators. The binary system presents better inter-observer agreement, while the WHO system presents better intra-observer agreement. Key words: Oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid lesion, oral lichenoid disease, dysplasia, inter-observer variation.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest No conflict of interest to disclose.<br /> (Copyright: © 2024 Medicina Oral S.L.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1989-5488
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38314343
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.61073