Back to Search Start Over

Bradycardia risk stratification with implantable loop recorder after unexplained syncope.

Authors :
De Ciancio G
Sadoul N
Hammache N
Pace N
Echivard M
Freysz L
Blangy H
Sellal JM
Olivier A
Source :
Archives of cardiovascular diseases [Arch Cardiovasc Dis] 2024 Mar; Vol. 117 (3), pp. 186-194. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 19.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: An implantable loop recorder is an effective tool for diagnosing unexplained syncope. However, after a first episode in non-high-risk patients, the usefulness of implantable loop recorder implantation remains unclear.<br />Aims: To analyse relevant risk factors for significant bradycardia in order to identify patients who do or do not benefit from implantable loop recorder implantation. Also, to study whether implantable loop recorder implantation with remote monitoring is associated with less recurrence of traumatic syncope.<br />Methods: This was a retrospective monocentric study including patients with implantable loop recorder implantation after unexplained syncope, using remote monitoring and iterative consultations.<br />Results: Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were implanted for unexplained syncope. Significant bradycardia occurred in 53 patients (22.4%): 23 (43.4%) caused by paroxysmal atrioventricular block and 30 (56.6%) caused by sinus node dysfunction, leading to permanent pacemaker implantation in 48 patients. Compared with younger patients, there was a 3.46-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.92-6.23; P<0.0001) in the risk of significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 years. Based on multivariable analysis, only "typical syncope" was associated with significant bradycardia occurrence (hazard ratio 3.14, 95% confidence interval 1.75-5.65; P=0.0001). There was no recurrence of significant bradycardia with traumatic complications among patients implanted for traumatic syncope.<br />Conclusions: This study shows that: (1) implantable loop recorders identify more significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 presenting with a first non-high-risk typical syncope, suggesting that an implantable loop recorder should be implanted after a first episode of unexplained syncope in such conditions; and (2) after traumatic syncope, implantable loop recorder implantation is safe, and is associated with little or no recurrence of traumatic syncope.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1875-2128
Volume :
117
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of cardiovascular diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38326152
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2023.12.007