Back to Search Start Over

Sorafenib and Metronomic Capecitabine in Child-Pugh B patients with advanced HCC: A real-life comparison with best supportive care.

Authors :
Stefanini B
Bucci L
Santi V
Reggidori N
Lani L
Granito A
Pelizzaro F
Cabibbo G
Di Marco M
Ghittoni G
Campani C
Svegliati-Baroni G
Foschi FG
Giannini EG
Biasini E
Saitta C
Magalotti D
Sangiovanni A
Guarino M
Gasbarrini A
Rapaccini GL
Masotto A
Sacco R
Vidili G
Mega A
Azzaroli F
Nardone G
Brandi G
Sabbioni S
Vitale A
Trevisani F
Source :
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver [Dig Liver Dis] 2024 Sep; Vol. 56 (9), pp. 1582-1591. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 09.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Aims: The efficacy of systemic therapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) has not been proven in patients with Child-Pugh (C-P) B cirrhosis. Nevertheless, in real-world these patients are treated both with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and with metronomic capecitabine (MC). This study aimed to compare sorafenib and MC outcomes versus best supportive care (BSC) in C-P B patients.<br />Method: Between 2008 and 2020, among 774 C-P B patients with aHCC not amenable/responsive to locoregional treatments, 410 underwent sorafenib, 62 MC, and 302 BSC. The propensity score matching method was used to correct the baseline unbalanced prognostic factors.<br />Results: In the unmatched population, median OS was 9.7 months in patients treated with sorafenib, 8.0 with MC, and 3.9 months with BSC. In sorafenib vs. BSC-matched patients (135 couples), median OS was 7.3 (4.9-9.6) vs. 3.9 (2.6-5.2) months (p<0.001). ECOG-Performance Status, tumor size, macrovascular invasion, AFP, treatment-naive, and sorafenib were independent predictors of survival. In MC vs. BSC-matched patients (40 couples), median OS was 9.0 (0.2-17.8) vs.3.0 (2.2-3.8) months (p<0.001). Median OS did not differ (p = 0.283) in sorafenib vs. MC-matched patients (55 couples).<br />Conclusion: C-P B patients with aHCC undergoing BSC have poor survival. Both Sorafenib and MC treatment improve their prognosis.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest GC declares consulting fees from Bayer, Roche, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; FGF (advisory board, consulting fees): AbbVie, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, MSD, and Intercept; EGG (advisory board, consulting fees): Astra Zeneca, Eisai, MSD, and Roche; GR (lectures, advisory board, consulting fees): Gilead, Alfa Wasserman, Intercept, and Eisai; FT (research grant, advisory board, consulting fees): Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, MSD, and Roche. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-3562
Volume :
56
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38341377
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.199