Structural and mechanical anisotropy in plant-based meat analogues.

The rising demand for plant-based meat analogues as alternatives to animal products has sparked interest in understanding the complex interplay between their structural and mechanical properties. The ability to manipulate the processing parameters and protein blend composition offers fundamental insights into the texturization process and holds economic and sustainable implications for the food industry. Consequently, the correlation between mechanical and structural properties in meat analogues is crucial for achieving consumer satisfaction and successful market penetration, providing comprehensive insights into the textural properties of meat analogues and their potential to mimic traditional animal produce. Our study delves into the relationship between structural and mechanical anisotropy in meat analogues produced using high moisture extrusion cooking, which involves blending protein, water, and other ingredients, followed by a controlled heating and cooling process to achieve a fibrous texture akin to traditional meat. By employing techniques such as scanning small-angle X-ray scattering, scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical testing we investigate the fibrous structure and its impact on the final texture of meat analogues. We show that textural and structural anisotropy is reflected on the mechanical properties measured using tensile and dynamic mechanical techniques. It is demonstrated that the calculated anisotropy indexes, a measure for the degree of textural and structural anisotropy, increase with increasing protein content. Our findings have significant implications for the understanding and development of plant-based meat analogues with structures that can be tuned to closely resemble the animal meat textures of choice, thereby enabling consumers to transition to more sustainable dietary choices while preserving familiar eating habits.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)