Back to Search Start Over

Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors :
Farkash A
Gordon A
Mohr R
Sela O
Pevni D
Ziv-Baran T
Grupper A
Kfir JE
Ben-Gal Y
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Feb 14; Vol. 19 (2), pp. e0297194. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 14 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: The optimal strategy for surgical revascularization in patients with impaired renal function is inconclusive. We compared early and late outcomes between bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) and single ITA (SITA) grafting in patients with renal dysfunction.<br />Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all the patients with multivessel disease and impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in our center during 1996-2011, utilizing either BITA or SITA revascularization.<br />Results: Of the 5301 patients with multivessel disease who underwent surgical revascularization during the study period, 391 were with impaired renal function: 212 (54.2%) underwent BITA, 179 (45.8%) underwent SITA. Patients who underwent BITA were less likely to have comorbidities. Statistically significant differences were not observed between the BITA and SITA groups in 30-day mortality (5.6% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.2) and in rates of early stroke, myocardial infarction, and sternal infection (4.5% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.467; 1.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.517; and 2.2% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.088, respectively). Long-term survival of the BITA group was better: median 8.36 vs. 4.14 years, p<0.001. In multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality (HR = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.556-0.89, p = 0.003). In analysis of a matched cohort (134 pairs), early outcomes did not differ between the groups; however, in multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality β€Žβ€Ž(HR = 0.35 (95%CI 0.18-0.68), p = 0.002)β€Ž.<br />Conclusions: BITA revascularization did not impact early outcome in patients with CRF, but demonstrated a significant protective effect on long-term survival β€Žin the unmatched and matched cohorts.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.<br /> (Copyright: © 2024 Farkash et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
19
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38354161
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297194