Back to Search
Start Over
A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Cemented and Cementless Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.
- Source :
-
The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2024 Aug; Vol. 39 (8), pp. 2007-2013. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 12. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Periprosthetic fractures are rare but serious complications of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Although cementless UKA has a lower risk of loosening than cemented, there are concerns that tibial fracture risk may be higher given the reliance on interference fit for primary stability. The risk of fracture and the effect of surgical fixation are currently unknown. We compared the periprosthetic fracture rate following cemented and cementless UKA surgery.<br />Methods: A total of 14,122 medial mobile-bearing UKAs (7,061 cemented and 7,061 cementless) from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episodes Statistics database were propensity score-matched. Cumulative fracture rates were calculated and Cox regressions were used to compare fixation groups.<br />Results: The three-month periprosthetic fracture rates were similar (P = .80), being 0.10% in the cemented group and 0.11% in the cementless group. The fracture rates were highest during the first three months postoperatively, but then decreased and remained constant between one and 10 years after surgery. The one-year cumulative fracture rates were 0.2% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.1 to 0.3) for cemented and 0.2% (CI: 0.1 to 0.3) for cementless cases. The 10-year cumulative fracture rates were 0.8% (CI: 0.2 to 1.3) and 0.8% (CI: 0.3 to 1.3), respectively. The hazard ratio during the whole study period was 1.06 (CI: 0.64 to 1.77; P = .79).<br />Conclusions: The periprosthetic fracture rate following mobile bearing UKA surgery is low, being about 1% at 10 years. There were no significant differences in fracture rates between cemented and cementless implants after matching. We surmise that surgeons are aware of the higher theoretical risk of early fracture with cementless components and take care with tibial preparation.<br />Levels of Evidence: III.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Aged
Female
Middle Aged
Northern Ireland epidemiology
England epidemiology
Wales epidemiology
Tibial Fractures surgery
Prosthesis Design
Aged, 80 and over
Cementation
Prosthesis Failure
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee adverse effects
Periprosthetic Fractures epidemiology
Periprosthetic Fractures etiology
Periprosthetic Fractures surgery
Registries
Knee Prosthesis adverse effects
Bone Cements
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-8406
- Volume :
- 39
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of arthroplasty
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38355062
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.019