The differential role of SSa/SSb and Ro52 antibodies in defining clinical phenotypes in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Objective: In idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, anti-SSa/SSb and anti-Ro52 are associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet few studies have compared their prognostic utility. Our study analyzes clinical phenotypes associated with anti-SSa/SSb and anti-Ro52 positivity in IIM and their association with ILD.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of IIM patients >18-years-old, seen at Northwell Myositis Center 2007- 2018 who met 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria with available anti-SSa/SSb data. Patients who were anti-SSa/SSb(-) and anti-Ro52(+) were excluded from anti-SSa/SSb subgroup analysis but included in Ro52 subgroup analysis. Organ manifestations, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and comorbidities were recorded. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Fisher's Exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum, McNemar's test.
Results: Of 94 patients included in the final analysis, 35% (33/94) were anti-SSa/SSb positive (+). Of 60 patients with anti-Ro52 data, 42% (25/60) were (+). ILD was more common in anti-SSa/SSb (+) versus anti-SSa/SSb negative patients and anti-Ro52(+) versus anti-Ro52 negative patients (58% vs 25%; p = 0.003 and 64% vs.26%; p = 0,004 respectively). Anti-SSa/SSb (+) was not associated with increased ILD severity based on PFTs. Anti-Ro52(+) group had lower DLCO than anti-Ro52(-) (47% vs 68%; p = 0.003). Anti-SSa/SSb positivity did not confer a difference in the frequency of other manifestations. Elevated rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (10%-12%) and osteoporosis (13-17%) were observed independent of anti-SSa/SSb or anti-Ro52 status.
Conclusion: In IIM anti-SSa/SSb or anti-Ro52 positivity is associated with higher ILD rate. Both assays are useful to confer ILD risk, but anti-Ro52 is more predictive of severe ILD. High frequencies of osteoporosis and VTE were observed in all subgroups.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)