Back to Search Start Over

GRADE pearls and pitfalls-Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines.

Authors :
Granholm A
Al Duhailib Z
Alhazzani W
Oczkowski S
Belley-Cote E
Møller MH
Source :
Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica [Acta Anaesthesiol Scand] 2024 May; Vol. 68 (5), pp. 593-600. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 21.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is the de facto standard framework for summarising evidence in systematic reviews and developing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.<br />Methods: We describe how the GRADE approach is used in clinical practice guidelines, including key points and examples. The intended audience of this overview of GRADE is clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of clinical practice guidelines.<br />Results: We cover guideline endorsement and adaptation; guideline panels and sponsors; conflicts of interest; guideline questions and outcome prioritisation; systematic review creation, updating and re-use; rating the overall certainty of evidence; development of recommendations and implications; and peer review, publication, implementation and updating of guidelines.<br />Conclusions: This overview aims to help developers, assessors and users of clinical practice guidelines understand how trustworthy, high-quality guidelines are developed using the GRADE approach.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1399-6576
Volume :
68
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38380849
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14384