A lateral extra-articular tenodesis without additional hardware: Surgical technique and biomechanical comparison with an anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Background: The aims of this study were to describe a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) using no additional hardware and compare the tibiofemoral kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction augmented with either the LET or a standard anatomic anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction using intra-tunnel fixation.
Methods: Ten cadaveric knees were mounted on a robotic testing system and underwent a kinematic assessment of anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot-shift in the following states: ACL-intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-sectioned/anterolateral complex (ALC)-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed/ALC-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed/ALL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/LET. For the LET, an iliotibial autograft was passed under the fibular collateral ligament and secured to the femur with the pull sutures of the ACL reconstruction femoral cortical suspensory fixation device, positioned at the distal ridge of Kaplan's fibers.
Results: Anterior tibial translation was restored to normal by ACL reconstruction without meaningful benefit of augmentation with LET or ALL. ACL reconstruction restored internal tibial rotation close to normal between 0° and 30°, but increased internal tibial rotation persisted between 45° and 90°. Augmentation of ACL reconstruction with the LET reduced internal rotation close to normal between 45° and 90°, whereas increased internal rotation persisted after ALL reconstruction.
Conclusion: ACL reconstruction and LET are complementary in controlling tibiofemoral kinematics of knees with a combined ACL and ALC injury: ACL reconstruction restored native tibiofemoral kinematics except for internal rotation at flexion greater than 30°. The increased internal rotation at flexion greater than 30° was restored to normal with an LET, but not with an ALL reconstruction.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees and the equipment and disposables for the all-inside ACL reconstruction were provided by Arthrex. This study was funded in part by the Departments of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine of the University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children’s Hospital. Dr. Schmale has received grants from SIGN Fracture Care Int and Arthrex, outside the submitted work. For the remaining authors none were declared.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)