Examining the impact of the device used for contouring in saving time and increasing the ease of contouring patients in radiotherapy treatment.

Introduction/background: This study was designed to investigate the amount of time saved and the degree of contour difficulty between the two methods of contouring, mouse/keyboard, versus touch screen/stylus in radiotherapy.
Methods: Each of 94 patients consisting of 26 breast cancer cases, 24 lymph nodes cases, 25 rectal cancer cases, and 19 heart cases has been contoured twice. One with a mouse/keyboard, and the next one with the touch screen/stylus. Three radiation oncologists participated in this study. Contouring information including measured time, estimated time spent, volume of contour performed and organ contoured are recorded. To evaluate the differences between the contouring methods, the results regarding target volume and time to completion were analyzed using two-way robust ANOVA. Ease of use and contouring difficulty were compared for differences in distribution of the response choices between the groups using Pearson chi-square test.
Results: In this study, 94 clinical cases were studied. The average time required for contouring with the touch screen/stylus method was half the time needed for contouring patients with the mouse/keyboard method. The reduction in the time in breast cancer cases was the highest (48.2%) and the lowest in head and neck cancer cases (32.4%). In comparing the contoured volumes, no significant difference was observed between the two methods. the mean estimated time reported by the radiation oncologist in the mouse/keyboard method was 5.6 minutes longer and, in the touch screen/stylus method, was 3.9 minutes less than the actual measured time.
Conclusions: All the measured and analyzed variables show the superiority of contouring with the touch screen/stylus method and reduced the time required for patient contouring by an average of 50%.
(Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)