Back to Search Start Over

Relationship Between Social Support and Clinical Outcomes: An Evaluation of Participant-Nominated Treatment Supporters in the HOPE 4 Intervention.

Authors :
Drakos A
McCready T
Lopez-Jaramillo P
Islam S
McKee M
Yusuf S
Schwalm JD
Source :
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes [Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes] 2024 Apr; Vol. 17 (4), pp. e009342. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 05.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The HOPE 4 trial (Heart Outcomes Prevention and Evaluation 4) investigated the effectiveness of a comprehensive, collaborative model of care, implemented in Colombia and Malaysia, which aimed to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with hypertension. One component of this intervention was the nomination of a treatment supporter, where participants could select a family member or friend to assist them with their care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of these individuals on participant outcomes, as well as the relationship dynamics between participants and their treatment supporter.<br />Methods: Participants in the HOPE 4 intervention group with baseline and 12 months of follow-up were included for analysis. They were divided into Every Visit (n=339) and <Every Visit (n=268) groups based on whether they had a treatment supporter for all 5 or for <5 follow-up visits, respectively. Outcomes were stratified between groups and tested for significance using a generalized linear mixed-effects model. A survey investigating participant satisfaction with their treatment supporter was administered at 12 months.<br />Results: Groups were majority female (53% versus 62%) with a mean age of 63 and 66 years. Country of origin differed between groups (22% versus 86%; Colombia). A 15.5% ([95% CI, 6.2%-24.8%] P =0.004) greater increase in statin medication use was reported in the Every Visit group at 12 months compared with the <Every Visit group. Sixty-one percent versus 48.2% of participants reported high medication adherence at 12 months ( P <0.003). The difference in change in systolic blood pressure between groups was not found to be significant at 12 months, though it favored the Every Visit group (-2.3 [95% CI, -6.1 to 1.5]; P =0.045). The majority of survey respondents from either study group strongly agreed that having a treatment supporter positively influenced their health.<br />Conclusions: Long-term support from a nominated treatment supporter was associated with improved adherence, risk factor management, and medication use among individuals with hypertension.<br />Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01826019.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Schwalm, Dr McCready, Dr Islam, and Dr Yusuf report that their institution received grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the Department of Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization, for the conduct of the study. Dr Lopez-Jaramillo reports that his institution received unrestricted grants from Grand Challenges Canada, and the Santander Departmental Secretary of Health, during the conduct of the study. Dr McKee reports that his institution received a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-7705
Volume :
17
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38440889
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009342