Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic value of histopathologic traits independent of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels in chemotherapy-naïve patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors :
de Boo LW
Jóźwiak K
Ter Hoeve ND
van Diest PJ
Opdam M
Wang Y
Schmidt MK
de Jong V
Kleiterp S
Cornelissen S
Baars D
Koornstra RHT
Kerver ED
van Dalen T
Bins AD
Beeker A
van den Heiligenberg SM
de Jong PC
Bakker SD
Rietbroek RC
Konings IR
Blankenburgh R
Bijlsma RM
Imholz ALT
Stathonikos N
Vreuls W
Sanders J
Rosenberg EH
Koop EA
Varga Z
van Deurzen CHM
Mooyaart AL
Córdoba A
Groen E
Bart J
Willems SM
Zolota V
Wesseling J
Sapino A
Chmielik E
Ryska A
Broeks A
Voogd AC
van der Wall E
Siesling S
Salgado R
Dackus GMHE
Hauptmann M
Kok M
Linn SC
Source :
ESMO open [ESMO Open] 2024 Mar; Vol. 9 (3), pp. 102923. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: In the absence of prognostic biomarkers, most patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) are treated with combination chemotherapy. The identification of biomarkers to select patients for whom treatment de-escalation or escalation could be considered remains an unmet need. We evaluated the prognostic value of histopathologic traits in a unique cohort of young, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy-naïve patients with early-stage (stage I or II), node-negative TNBC and long-term follow-up, in relation to stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) for which the prognostic value was recently reported.<br />Materials and Methods: We studied all 485 patients with node-negative eTNBC from the population-based PARADIGM cohort which selected women aged <40 years diagnosed between 1989 and 2000. None of the patients had received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy according to standard practice at the time. Associations between histopathologic traits and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models.<br />Results: With a median follow-up of 20.0 years, an independent prognostic value for BCSS was observed for lymphovascular invasion (LVI) [adjusted (adj.) hazard ratio (HR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-3.69], fibrotic focus (adj. HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.37) and sTILs (per 10% increment adj. HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82). In the sTILs <30% subgroup, the presence of LVI resulted in a higher cumulative incidence of breast cancer death (at 20 years, 58%; 95% CI 41% to 72%) compared with when LVI was absent (at 20 years, 32%; 95% CI 26% to 39%). In the ≥75% sTILs subgroup, the presence of LVI might be associated with poor survival (HR 11.45, 95% CI 0.71-182.36, two deaths). We confirm the lack of prognostic value of androgen receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -low status.<br />Conclusions: sTILs, LVI and fibrotic focus provide independent prognostic information in young women with node-negative eTNBC. Our results are of importance for the selection of patients for de-escalation and escalation trials.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosure PJvD has advisory relationships with Paige, Pantarei and Samantree, paid to the institution, and research grants paid to the institute from Pfizer. NS received institutional research funding from Pfizer. ZV has a consulting role for Roche. CHMvD received institutional research funding from AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo. SMW has a consulting role for Roche, and received institutional research funding from Roche, Pfizer, Bayer, MSD, AstraZeneca/Merck and Amgen. SMW has a consulting role for IDDI, Sensorion, Biophytis, Servier, Yuhan, Amaris Consulting and Roche. JW received institutional research funding from Cancer Research UK and KWF Dutch Cancer Society. AR has a consulting role for MSD Oncology, Amgen, Roche, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. SCL reports grants from ZonMw and A Sister’s Hope during the conduct of the study; has been an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Cergentis, IBM, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Roche; and received institutional research grants from Agendia, AstraZeneca, Eurocept-pharmaceuticals and Merck and Pfizer. In addition, SCL received institutional research grants and institutional non-financial support from Agendia, Genentech, Novartis, Roche, Tesaro and Immunomedics and other institutional support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Cergentis, Daiichi Sankyo, IBM and Bayer outside the submitted work. MK is an advisory board member and/or received speakers’ fee for/from Alderaan, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Domain Therapeutics, Gilead, Roche, Medscape, MSD and AZ/Daiichi and received institutional research support from AstraZeneca/Daiichi, BMS and Roche outside the submitted work. RS reports non-financial support from Merck and BMS, research support from Merck, Puma Biotechnology and Roche, and personal fees from Roche, BMS and Exact Sciences for advisory boards. IRK received research grants from Novartis and Gilead. RHTK is an advisory board member for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre Sante, Sanofi and Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2059-7029
Volume :
9
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
ESMO open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38452438
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102923