Back to Search Start Over

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10-year randomized trial.

Authors :
Donker VJJ
Raghoebar GM
Slagter KW
Hentenaar DFM
Vissink A
Meijer HJA
Source :
Journal of clinical periodontology [J Clin Periodontol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 51 (6), pp. 722-732. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aim: To compare the marginal bone level of immediately placed implants, with either immediate or delayed provisionalization (IP or DP), in the maxillary aesthetic zone after 10 years of function.<br />Materials and Methods: Participants with a failing tooth in the maxillary aesthetic zone were randomly assigned to immediate implant placement with either IP (n = 20) or DP (n = 20) after primary wound closure with a free gingival graft. The final restoration was placed 3 months after provisionalization. The primary outcome was change in marginal bone level. In addition, implant survival, restoration survival and success, peri-implant tissue health, mucosa levels, aesthetic indices, buccal bone thickness and patient satisfaction were evaluated.<br />Results: After 10 years, the mean mesial and distal changes in marginal bone level were -0.47 ± 0.45 mm and -0.49 ± 0.52 mm in the IP group and -0.58 ± 0.76 mm and -0.41 ± 0.72 mm in the DP group (p = .61; p = .71). The survival rate was 100% for the implants; for the restorations, it was 88.9% in the IP group and 87.5% in the DP group. Restoration success, according to modified USPHS criteria, was 77.8% in the IP group and 75.0% in the DP group. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis was 38.9% and 35.7% and of peri-implantitis 0.0% and 6.3%, respectively, in the IP group and DP group (p = 1.0; p = .40). The Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score was 15.28 ± 2.32 in the IP group and 14.64 ± 2.74 in the DP group, both clinically acceptable (p = .48). The buccal bone thickness was lower in the DP group. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (p = .75).<br />Conclusions: The mean marginal bone level changes after immediate implant placement with IP were similar to those after immediate placement with DP.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: Registered in the National Trial Register (NL9340).<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1600-051X
Volume :
51
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical periodontology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38454548
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13971