Back to Search Start Over

Predicting five-year interval second breast cancer risk in women with prior breast cancer.

Authors :
Hubbard RA
Su YR
Bowles EJA
Ichikawa L
Kerlikowske K
Lowry KP
Miglioretti DL
Tosteson ANA
Wernli KJ
Lee JM
Source :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute [J Natl Cancer Inst] 2024 Jun 07; Vol. 116 (6), pp. 929-937.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Annual surveillance mammography is recommended for women with a personal history of breast cancer. Risk prediction models that estimate mammography failures such as interval second breast cancers could help to tailor surveillance imaging regimens to women's individual risk profiles.<br />Methods: In a cohort of women with a history of breast cancer receiving surveillance mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium in 1996-2019, we used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-penalized regression to estimate the probability of an interval second cancer (invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the 1 year after a negative surveillance mammogram. Based on predicted risks from this one-year risk model, we generated cumulative risks of an interval second cancer for the five-year period after each mammogram. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation in the overall cohort and within race and ethnicity strata.<br />Results: In 173 290 surveillance mammograms, we observed 496 interval cancers. One-year risk models were well-calibrated (expected/observed ratio = 1.00) with good accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.64). Model performance was similar across race and ethnicity groups. The median five-year cumulative risk was 1.20% (interquartile range 0.93%-1.63%). Median five-year risks were highest in women who were under age 40 or pre- or perimenopausal at diagnosis and those with estrogen receptor-negative primary breast cancers.<br />Conclusions: Our risk model identified women at high risk of interval second breast cancers who may benefit from additional surveillance imaging modalities. Risk models should be evaluated to determine if risk-guided supplemental surveillance imaging improves early detection and decreases surveillance failures.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1460-2105
Volume :
116
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38466940
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae063