Back to Search Start Over

Can Internal Carotid Arteries Be Used for Noninvasive Quantification of Brain PET Studies?

Authors :
ProvidĂȘncia L
van der Weijden CWJ
Mohr P
van Sluis J
van Snick JH
Slart RHJA
Dierckx RAJO
Lammertsma AA
Tsoumpas C
Source :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2024 Apr 01; Vol. 65 (4), pp. 600-606. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 01.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Because of the limited axial field of view of conventional PET scanners, the internal carotid arteries are commonly used to obtain an image-derived input function (IDIF) in quantitative brain PET. However, time-activity curves extracted from the internal carotids are prone to partial-volume effects due to the limited PET resolution. This study aimed to assess the use of the internal carotids for quantifying brain glucose metabolism before and after partial-volume correction. Methods: Dynamic [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]FDG images were acquired on a 106-cm-long PET scanner, and quantification was performed with a 2-tissue-compartment model and Patlak analysis using an IDIF extracted from the internal carotids. An IDIF extracted from the ascending aorta was used as ground truth. Results: The internal carotid IDIF underestimated the area under the curve by 37% compared with the ascending aorta IDIF, leading to K <subscript>i</subscript> values approximately 17% higher. After partial-volume correction, the mean relative K <subscript>i</subscript> differences calculated with the ascending aorta and internal carotid IDIFs dropped to 7.5% and 0.05%, when using a 2-tissue-compartment model and Patlak analysis, respectively. However, microparameters ( K <subscript>1</subscript> , k <subscript>2</subscript> , k <subscript>3</subscript> ) derived from the corrected internal carotid curve differed significantly from those obtained using the ascending aorta. Conclusion: These results suggest that partial-volume-corrected internal carotids may be used to estimate K <subscript>i</subscript> but not kinetic microparameters. Further validation in a larger patient cohort with more variable kinetics is needed for more definitive conclusions.<br /> (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-5667
Volume :
65
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38485272
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266675