Distinctive clinical and imaging trajectories in SWEDD and Parkinson's disease patients.

A proportion of patients clinically diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD) can have a ¹²³ I-FP-CIT-SPECT scan without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD), generating a debate about the underlying biological mechanisms. This study investigated differences in clinical features, ¹²³ I-FP-CIT binding, molecular connectivity, as well as clinical and imaging progression between SWEDD and PD patients. We included 36 SWEDD, 49 de novo idiopathic PD, and 49 healthy controls with ¹²³ I-FP-CIT-SPECT from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative. Clinical and imaging 2-year follow-ups were available for 27 SWEDD and 40 PD. Regional-based and voxel-wise analysis assessed dopaminergic integrity in dorsal and ventral striatal, as well as extrastriatal regions, at baseline and follow-up. Molecular connectivity analyses evaluated dopaminergic pathways. Spatial correlation analyses tested whether ¹²³ I-FP-CIT-binding alterations would also pertain to the serotoninergic system. SWEDD and PD patients showed comparable symptoms at baseline, except for hyposmia, which was more severe for PD. PD showed significantly lower striatal and extrastriatal ¹²³ I-FP-CIT-binding compared to SWEDD and controls. SWEDD exhibited lower binding than controls in striatal regions, insula, and olfactory cortex. Both PD and SWEDD showed extensive altered connectivity of dopaminergic pathways, however, with major impairment in the mesocorticolimbic system for SWEDD. Motor symptoms and dopaminergic deficits worsened after 2 years for PD only. The limited dopaminergic impairment and its stability over time observed for SWEDD, as well as the presence of extrastriatal ¹²³ I-FP-CIT binding alterations and prevalent mesocorticolimbic connectivity impairment, suggest other mechanisms contributing to SWEDD pathophysiology.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)