Back to Search
Start Over
Sacubitril/valsartan compared to equivalent/sub-equivalent dose angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Source :
-
European journal of clinical pharmacology [Eur J Clin Pharmacol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 80 (8), pp. 1113-1120. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 10. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine how sacubitril/valsartan (SV) compares to equivalent and sub-equivalent angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).<br />Methods: The databases of PubMed and EMBASE were used to identify those randomized controlled trials which compared SV to ARB/ACEI in patients with HFrEF. Only those trials that reported outcomes regarding total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening heart failure were considered. Meta-analysis was performed separately in those patients receiving equivalent doses of ARB/ACEI and those receiving sub-equivalent doses. Equivalent doses were SV 97/103 = valsartan 160 mg twice daily = enalapril 20 mg twice daily = ramipril 5 mg twice daily. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.<br />Results: Twelve randomized trials were identified involving 17,484 patients: 11,291 in the sub-equivalent group (8 trials) and 6193 in the equivalent group (4 trials). Meta-analyses showed there were no statistical differences regarding the outcomes of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening heart failure in the equivalent dosing group. However, SV reduced total mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-0.93, p < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.73-0.90, p ≤ 0.001) and worsening heart failure (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64-0.92, p = 0.005) in the sub-equivalent group.<br />Conclusion: When compared to equivalent doses of ARB/ACEI, SV is not superior in reducing mortality and worsening heart failure. SV is superior when compared to sub-equivalent doses of ACEI.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Drug Combinations
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stroke Volume drug effects
Aminobutyrates administration & dosage
Aminobutyrates therapeutic use
Aminobutyrates adverse effects
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors administration & dosage
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use
Biphenyl Compounds administration & dosage
Biphenyl Compounds therapeutic use
Heart Failure drug therapy
Heart Failure mortality
Heart Failure physiopathology
Tetrazoles administration & dosage
Tetrazoles therapeutic use
Valsartan administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1432-1041
- Volume :
- 80
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of clinical pharmacology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38597935
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03686-6