Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of high-performance human papillomavirus testing to improve cervical cancer screening in China: a prospective population-based multicentre cohort study.
- Source :
-
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases [Clin Microbiol Infect] 2024 Sep; Vol. 30 (9), pp. 1190-1196. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 08. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of HBRT-H14, a real-time PCR-based assay that separates human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV18 from 12 other high-risk (HR) HPV types, in population according to Chinese guideline.<br />Methods: A total of 9829 eligible women aged 21-64 years from Henan, Shanxi, and Guangdong provinces were performed by HBRT-H14 testing and liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening at baseline and followed up for 3-year. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (absolute risk), and negative predictive value of LBC diagnosis and HPV testing were calculated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) Lesions.<br />Results: At baseline, 80 (0.81%) participants were diagnosed with CIN2+. HR-HPV with reflex LBC had a significantly higher sensitivity (78/80, 97.50% [95% CI, 91.34-99.31%] vs. 62/80, 77.50% [67.21-85.27%], McNemar's test p < 0.001), and a slightly lower specificity (8528/9749, 87.48% [86.80-88.12%] vs. 8900/9749, 91.29% [90.72-91.83%], McNemar's test p < 0.001) than LBC with reflex HR-HPV for CIN2+. 7832 (79.6%) participants completed 3-year follow-up and 172 (2.20%) participants were cumulatively diagnosed with CIN2+. Compared with LBC with reflex HR-HPV, HR-HPV with reflex LBC significantly increased the sensitivity (161/172, 93.60% [88.91-96.39%] vs. 87/172, 50.58% [43.18-57.96%], McNemar's test p < 0.001), but marginally decreased the specificity (6776/7660, 88.46% [87.72-89.16%] vs. 6933/7660, 90.51% [89.83-91.15], McNemar's test p < 0.001). In addition, the absolute 3-year risk of CIN2+ in HPV16/18-positive individuals was as high as 33% (80/238), whereas the risk in the HPV-negative population was only 0.16% (11/6787), much lower than those in the negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy population (1.21%, 85/7018). Moreover, similar results were found in women ≥30 years old.<br />Discussion: The study has indicated that HBRT-14 has a reliable clinical performance for use in cervical screening. The validated HPV test would improve the quality of population screening.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Young Adult
China epidemiology
Mass Screening methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction methods
Early Detection of Cancer methods
Human papillomavirus 18 isolation & purification
Human papillomavirus 18 genetics
Papillomavirus Infections diagnosis
Papillomavirus Infections virology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia virology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms virology
Human papillomavirus 16 genetics
Human papillomavirus 16 isolation & purification
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1469-0691
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38599463
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.035