Cite
Percutaneous Versus Surgical Femoral Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
MLA
Kirov, Hristo, et al. “Percutaneous Versus Surgical Femoral Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.), vol. 19, no. 3, May 2024, pp. 247–53. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845241241534.
APA
Kirov, H., Caldonazo, T., Runkel, A., Fischer, J., Tasoudis, P., Mukharyamov, M., Cancelli, G., Dell’Aquila, M., & Doenst, T. (2024). Percutaneous Versus Surgical Femoral Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.), 19(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845241241534
Chicago
Kirov, Hristo, Tulio Caldonazo, Angelique Runkel, Johannes Fischer, Panagiotis Tasoudis, Murat Mukharyamov, Gianmarco Cancelli, Michele Dell’Aquila, and Torsten Doenst. 2024. “Percutaneous Versus Surgical Femoral Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.) 19 (3): 247–53. doi:10.1177/15569845241241534.