Back to Search
Start Over
Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With the Harmony Valve in Patients Who Do Not Meet Recommended Oversizing Criteria on the Screening Perimeter Plot.
- Source :
-
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions [Circ Cardiovasc Interv] 2024 May; Vol. 17 (5), pp. e013889. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 12. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Anatomic selection for Harmony valve implant is determined with the aid of a screening report and perimeter plot (PP) that depicts the perimeter-derived radius along the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and projects device oversizing. The PP provides an estimation of suitability for implant, but its sensitivity as a screening method is unknown. This study was performed to describe anatomic features and outcomes in patients who underwent Harmony TPV25 implant despite a PP that predicted inadequate oversizing.<br />Methods: We reviewed RVOT anatomic features and measurements in patients who underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Harmony TPV25 device despite a PP that predicted inadequate oversizing.<br />Results: This study included 22 patients. There were no unsuccessful implants or adverse valve-related events. Anatomic features varied, but all patients fit into 1 of 3 anatomic types characterized by differences in RVOT dimensions. Type 1 patients (n=9) had a long RVOT with a choke point and a wide main pulmonary artery. Type 2 patients (n=6) had a short RVOT that was pyramidal in shape, with no choke point, and extensive main pulmonary artery lengthening/expansion during systole. Type 3 patients (n=7) had a short, bulbous main pulmonary artery with a choke point and an open pulmonary artery bifurcation.<br />Conclusions: Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Harmony valve is feasible in some patients whose PP fit analysis predicts inadequate oversizing. All cases in this series fit into 1 of 3 anatomic patterns, which are not identified in the screening report. Implanters must review cases individually to assess the feasibility of the implant.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs McElhinney and Aboulhosn worked as Proctor and consultant for Medtronic and Edwards. Dr Gillespie is a consultant and proctor for Medtronic and W.L. Gore and Associates. Dr Cabalka is a Consultant for Medtronic, Edwards, and B. Braun. Dr Morray worked as Proctor and consultant for Medtronic and Abbott. Dr Balzer worked as Proctor and consultant for Medtronic, Edwards, and Abbott. Dr Qureshi worked as proctor and consultant for Medtronic, W.L. Gore and Associates, and B. Braun. Dr Goldstein worked as consultant and Proctor for Medtronic and W.L. Gore & Associates, Consultant for Edwards, Consultant and Advisory Board Member for PECA Labs and Mezzion Pharmaceuticals.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Treatment Outcome
Male
Female
Adolescent
Young Adult
Child
Adult
Retrospective Studies
Predictive Value of Tests
Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency surgery
Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency physiopathology
Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency diagnostic imaging
Patient Selection
Clinical Decision-Making
Recovery of Function
Hemodynamics
Pulmonary Valve surgery
Pulmonary Valve diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Valve physiopathology
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Cardiac Catheterization instrumentation
Cardiac Catheterization adverse effects
Prosthesis Design
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1941-7632
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38606564
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013889