Back to Search Start Over

Association Between Medicare's Sepsis Reporting Policy (SEP-1) and the Documentation of a Sepsis Diagnosis in the Clinical Record.

Authors :
Barbash IJ
Davis BS
Saul M
Hwa R
Brant EB
Seymour CW
Kahn JM
Source :
Medical care [Med Care] 2024 Jun 01; Vol. 62 (6), pp. 388-395. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 12.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Study Design: Interrupted time series analysis of a retrospective, electronic health record cohort.<br />Objective: To determine the association between the implementation of Medicare's sepsis reporting measure (SEP-1) and sepsis diagnosis rates as assessed in clinical documentation.<br />Background: The role of health policy in the effort to improve sepsis diagnosis remains unclear.<br />Patients and Methods: Adult patients hospitalized with suspected infection and organ dysfunction within 6 hours of presentation to the emergency department, admitted to one of 11 hospitals in a multi-hospital health system from January 2013 to December 2017. Clinician-diagnosed sepsis, as reflected by the inclusion of the terms "sepsis" or "septic" in the text of clinical notes in the first two calendar days following presentation.<br />Results: Among 44,074 adult patients with sepsis admitted to 11 hospitals over 5 years, the proportion with sepsis documentation was 32.2% just before the implementation of SEP-1 in the third quarter of 2015 and increased to 37.3% by the fourth quarter of 2017. Of the 9 post-SEP-1 quarters, 8 had odds ratios for a sepsis diagnosis >1 (overall range: 0.98-1.26; P value for a joint test of statistical significance = 0.005). The effects were clinically modest, with a maximum effect of an absolute increase of 4.2% (95% CI: 0.9-7.8) at the end of the study period. The effect was greater in patients who did not require vasopressors compared with patients who required vasopressors ( P value for test of interaction = 0.02).<br />Conclusions: SEP-1 implementation was associated with modest increases in sepsis diagnosis rates, primarily among patients who did not require vasoactive medications.<br />Competing Interests: I.J.B. was granted funding from K08HS025455 from AHRQ, and C.W.S. was granted funding from R35GM119519. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-1948
Volume :
62
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Medical care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38620117
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001997