Back to Search
Start Over
Association Between Medicare's Sepsis Reporting Policy (SEP-1) and the Documentation of a Sepsis Diagnosis in the Clinical Record.
- Source :
-
Medical care [Med Care] 2024 Jun 01; Vol. 62 (6), pp. 388-395. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 12. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Study Design: Interrupted time series analysis of a retrospective, electronic health record cohort.<br />Objective: To determine the association between the implementation of Medicare's sepsis reporting measure (SEP-1) and sepsis diagnosis rates as assessed in clinical documentation.<br />Background: The role of health policy in the effort to improve sepsis diagnosis remains unclear.<br />Patients and Methods: Adult patients hospitalized with suspected infection and organ dysfunction within 6 hours of presentation to the emergency department, admitted to one of 11 hospitals in a multi-hospital health system from January 2013 to December 2017. Clinician-diagnosed sepsis, as reflected by the inclusion of the terms "sepsis" or "septic" in the text of clinical notes in the first two calendar days following presentation.<br />Results: Among 44,074 adult patients with sepsis admitted to 11 hospitals over 5 years, the proportion with sepsis documentation was 32.2% just before the implementation of SEP-1 in the third quarter of 2015 and increased to 37.3% by the fourth quarter of 2017. Of the 9 post-SEP-1 quarters, 8 had odds ratios for a sepsis diagnosis >1 (overall range: 0.98-1.26; P value for a joint test of statistical significance = 0.005). The effects were clinically modest, with a maximum effect of an absolute increase of 4.2% (95% CI: 0.9-7.8) at the end of the study period. The effect was greater in patients who did not require vasopressors compared with patients who required vasopressors ( P value for test of interaction = 0.02).<br />Conclusions: SEP-1 implementation was associated with modest increases in sepsis diagnosis rates, primarily among patients who did not require vasoactive medications.<br />Competing Interests: I.J.B. was granted funding from K08HS025455 from AHRQ, and C.W.S. was granted funding from R35GM119519. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
United States
Retrospective Studies
Male
Female
Aged
Middle Aged
Emergency Service, Hospital statistics & numerical data
Aged, 80 and over
Sepsis diagnosis
Medicare statistics & numerical data
Documentation statistics & numerical data
Documentation standards
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Electronic Health Records
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1537-1948
- Volume :
- 62
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Medical care
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38620117
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001997