Back to Search Start Over

Real-life experience on the effectiveness of conjunctival flap and amniotic membrane graft in the treatment of refractory fungal corneal ulcer.

Authors :
Mahmuda K
Thakur M
Talukdar PK
Tanim TE
Chowdury MKI
Shanta S
Afroz MS
Khan MAS
Hasan MJ
Source :
Japanese journal of ophthalmology [Jpn J Ophthalmol] 2024 May; Vol. 68 (3), pp. 233-242. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 25.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the results of the conjunctival flap (CF) and cryopreserved amniotic membrane graft (AMG) in the management of fungal corneal ulcers either with complications or non-responsive to medical treatment.<br />Study Design: A retrospective observational study.<br />Methods: Medical records of 30 patients with culture-positive fungal corneal ulcer treated with either CF or AMG (15 eyes in each group) in real world settings were retrieved for analysis. After the surgical procedure, patients were followed up on days 1, 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 to explore the outcomes of the operations along with complications.<br />Results: Infecting fungi were of genus Fusarium (n = 11), Aspergillus (n = 10), Mucor (n = 4) and Penicillium (n = 10). The most common indication was resistant ulcer with perforation. After the procedure, epithelization was completed in 11(73.33%) patients in the CF, and 13 patients in the (86.67%) AMG group. Visual acuity improvement was significantly better in the latter group (CF: 1 [6.67%] vs. AMG: 7 [46.67%], p = 0.023). Flap failure occurred in 4 patients (26.67%) from the CF and 2 (13.33%) from the AMG group. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding success rate (p = 0.651), epithelialization time (p = 0.691), healing of corneal ulcer (p = 0.651), and postoperative stability (p = 0.651) of the flaps.<br />Conclusions: CF and AMG are both effective for the management of refractory fungal corneal ulcers. However, AMG appears to improve visual acuity better than CF.<br /> (© 2024. Japanese Ophthalmological Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1613-2246
Volume :
68
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Japanese journal of ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38658453
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01062-6