Back to Search Start Over

Effect of increased resistance on dynamic compliance assessed by two clinical monitors during volume-controlled ventilation: A test-lung study.

Authors :
Ben-Aderet D
Soares JH
Bueno ML
Source :
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia [Vet Anaesth Analg] 2024 Jul-Aug; Vol. 51 (4), pp. 322-332. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 09.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of increased respiratory system resistance (R <subscript>RS</subscript> ) on dynamic compliance (C <subscript>dyn</subscript> ) assessed by the NM3 monitor (C <subscript>dyn(NM3)</subscript> ) and the E-CAiOV module (C <subscript>dyn(ECAiOV)</subscript> ).<br />Study Design: Prospective laboratory study.<br />Methods: A training test lung (TTL) simulated the mechanical ventilation of a mammal with 50 and 300 mL tidal volumes in three conditions of R <subscript>RS</subscript> [normal (R <subscript>BL</subscript> ), moderately increased (R <subscript>1</subscript> ) and severely increased (R <subscript>2</subscript> )] and a wide range of clinically relevant C <subscript>dyn</subscript> . Simulations at increased R <subscript>RS</subscript> were paired with simulations at R <subscript>BL</subscript> with the same static compliance for comparisons. Pearson's correlation coefficient and concordance correlation coefficient between the measurements at R <subscript>BL</subscript> with the ones with increased R <subscript>RS</subscript> were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were also used to evaluate the agreement of C <subscript>dyn(ECAiOV)</subscript> and C <subscript>dyn(NM3)</subscript> at R <subscript>BL</subscript> (control values) with their paired values at R <subscript>1</subscript> and R <subscript>2</subscript> . Relative bias and limits of agreement (LOAs) were calculated and LOAs larger than 30% were considered unacceptable. Trending ability of C <subscript>dyn(NM3)</subscript> and C <subscript>dyn(ECAiOV)</subscript> were evaluated by polar plots. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.<br />Results: The effect of increased R <subscript>RS</subscript> was more pronounced for C <subscript>dyn(ECAiOV)</subscript> than for C <subscript>dyn(NM3)</subscript> . Unacceptable agreement was only observed in C <subscript>dyn(NM3)</subscript> at R <subscript>2</subscript> in the 300 mL simulation (bias = -18.3% and lower LOA = -45%). For C <subscript>dyn(ECAiOV)</subscript> , agreement was unacceptable for all tested R <subscript>RS</subscript> in both simulations, being the worst at R <subscript>2</subscript> in the 300 mL simulation (bias = -54.7% and lower LOA = -100.2%). Both levels of increased R <subscript>RS</subscript> caused poor trending ability for C <subscript>dyn(ECAiOV)</subscript> , whereas the same effect was only observed for C <subscript>dyn(NM3)</subscript> at R <subscript>2</subscript> .<br />Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: In the presence of increased R <subscript>RS</subscript> , C <subscript>dyn</subscript> estimated by the NM3 monitor presented better capability to distinguish between changes in R <subscript>RS</subscript> from changes in respiratory system compliance.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1467-2995
Volume :
51
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38677969
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.03.003