Back to Search Start Over

Bioequivalence prediction with small-scale biphasic dissolution and simultaneous dissolution-permeation apparatus-An aripiprazole case study.

Authors :
Kádár S
Kennedy A
Lee S
Ruiz R
Farkas A
Tőzsér P
Csicsák D
Tóth G
Sinkó B
Borbás E
Source :
European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences [Eur J Pharm Sci] 2024 Jul 01; Vol. 198, pp. 106782. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 01.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Both biphasic dissolution and simultaneous dissolution-permeation (D-P) systems have great potential to improve the in vitro-in vivo correlation compared to simple dissolution assays, but the assay conditions, and the evaluation methods still need to be refined in order to effectively use these apparatuses in drug development. Therefore, this comprehensive study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of small-volume (16-20 mL) D-P system and small-volume (40-80 mL) biphasic dissolution apparatus in bioequivalence prediction of five aripiprazole (ARP) containing marketed drug products. Assay conditions, specifically dose dependence were studied to overcome the limitations of both small-scale systems. In case of biphasic dissolution the in vivo maximum plasma concentration (C <subscript>max</subscript> ) prediction greatly improved with the dose reduction of ARP, while in case of the D-P setup the use of whole tablet gave just as accurate prediction as the scaled dose. With the dose reduction strategy both equipment was able to reach 100 % accuracy in bioequivalence prediction for C <subscript>max</subscript> ratio. In case of the in vivo area under the curve (AUC) prediction the predictive accuracy for the AUC ratio was not dependent on the dose, and both apparatus had a 100 % accuracy predicting bioequivalence based on AUC results. This paper presents for the first time that not only selected parameters of flux assays (like permeability, initial flux, AUC value) were used as an input parameter of a mechanistic model (gastrointestinal unified theory) to predict absorption rate but the whole in vitro flux profile was used. All fraction absorbed values estimated by Predictor Software fell within the ±15 % acceptance range during the comparison with the in vivo data.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0720
Volume :
198
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38697313
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106782