Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and safety of catheter-based thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors :
Zhang RS
Maqsood MH
Greco AA
Postelnicu R
Mukherjee V
Alviar CL
Bangalore S
Source :
American heart journal [Am Heart J] 2024 Jun; Vol. 272, pp. 109-112. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 17.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Data comparing catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute pulmonary embolism are lacking. To address this, we performed a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies of CBT and compared it to performance goal rates of mortality and major bleeding from a recently published network meta-analysis. When compared with performance goal for CDT based on historical studies, CBT was noninferior for all-cause mortality (6.0% vs 6.87%; P-value <subscript>NI</subscript> < .001), non-inferior and superior for major bleeding (4.9% vs 11%; P-value <subscript>NI</subscript> < .001 and P < .001 for superiority).<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Dr. Bangalore- Advisory board- Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, REATA, Inari, Truvic.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6744
Volume :
272
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American heart journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38705637
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.009